Am allow in person attendance approximate Public Comment providing Remote Access via phone. Will take Public Comment by each item in person will be allowed to speak first then to the remote phone line. For those watching channel 26, 28, 78 or 99 and sfgov. Org the call in number is streaming. The number is 4156550001. Upon eshd meeting id 2485 132 7480 when connected you hear the discussions but in listening mode only. When your item come up and Public Comment is called those in person line up near the curtains and those on the phone line should dial star 3 to be added to the queue f. You are on your phone remember to turn down your television and listening device. As already indicated. Will take Public Comment attends nothing person first and then we move on to our remote call in line. You may submit comment in the following ways e mail myself erica. Major sfgov. Org if testimony be forwarded not supervisors and made part of the official file byus postal to city hall 1 doctor carlton b. Goodlet place. Items acted will be on july 26 unless otherwise stated thank you, madam clerk to add to the announcements. Masking is recommended but not required in the bodiesing. Be respectful to those arnold schmuhl provide space if you are seated or lined up for comment. Thank you. Police call item one. An ordinance amending the planning code to create electric charging location electric vehicle charging location without cu authorization and permit conversion to electric vehicle charging locations and resunrising control table to reflect these changes. Member who is would like to speak on item one dial 4156550001 there are 30s. Meeting id 2485 132 7480 to speak press star 3 and you will raise your hand. Madam chair. Thank you. So you may remember this item was condition friday last week due to amendments. We have further amendments which are nonsubstantive. But mr. Chu from d. Environment can talk us through. Good afternoon madam chair and supervisors. This ev charging item was presented and amended in the last Committee Meeting we have no further changes on our ends since then. Department of the environment and planning are here to answer questions you may have. Thank you. Thank you. Supervisor peskin do you want to talk about the amendments. Thank you, chair melgar. And as you recall at our last hearing we duplicated the file made amendments to both and as to the duplicated file there were amendments to conditional use findings, which will be referred to the Planning Department for hearing by the Planning Commission and we will be back some time in the fall. And as to the remaining file that is before us, upon one 91 substantive amendment at page 14, which is online 19. And this is the table for pdr zones that we amended the original legislation in pdr1b has always held that be subject to conditional use. But in pdr1d and g and pdr2, we changed those at a previous hearing from p to c. And to today i would like to add a footnote to those 3pdr districts. Footnote 24 i circulated to the members of the committee indicating those would be permitted as of right where existing use is a private parking lot or vehicle storage lot defined in the code, which i believe applies to 12 existing facilities. Okay. You want to shed light on where they are. Or i would i can try. Give me a minute while i look that up. I believe nose 4 at, these are mostly existing taxi locations, 75 waterloo loomis. 270 mc kinin. 22 geraldine. 300 tolen. 16th. Mississippi, mandel and 3017th street all in district 10 . They are all in district 10 the original legislation had all of these permitted we changed them to cu and this would allow the 12 cites to be permitted thank you for the explanation supervisor peskin. Lets if there is any questions from supervisor preston go to Public Comment. Madam clerk. Thank you, madam chair. Are there members withhold like to speak on item 1, approach the podium and lineup notoriety kurt anxiety. Online, press star 3 if you have not done so already. You can approach the podium. Good afternoon supervisors. Tom, from liveable city. We support electricification of the Transportation System and thank you for bringing forward ideas will support this. The science is behind this that depentedance on electric vehicles have disvajs as automobiles. They are energy intensive. Takeum an amount of space. A danger to pedestrians in order to get to Sustainable Transportation in the future. We need to focus on electrifying the vehicle fleet and also on car free living. 3 years ago we worked with supervisor mandelman looking at the service station gas station question. We want ev charging but could we think of the gas stations as supporting car free living in and so in that legislation we said, all right. Now, under code, if you stop dispensing morvehicle fuels and service stipulation has to go. It is right to strike that out. But in the currently legislation you become ev charge or stay a service station. We took a more fleckable frooch. No longer dispense motor fuel vehicles but you can allow ev charging, allow bike and car share. They are sustainable hubs people go, pick up a vehicle. Still allow the repair and service of vehicles. You will have repair we dont believe the current ordinance allows that. We recommend you add back that flexible to section 187 use the parking legislation as a guide and add it to 102 definitions so they can become sustainable mobility hubs and support. Are there other members that would like to speak on item one in the chamber . Moving to the remote call in line. We have 8 listens with 3 in the queue. James, take the first caller, please. Good upon afternoon, supervisor mark here. On behalf of officers ever teamster 665. We are supportive of expansion of ev charging throughout our city. Expansion will benefit both workers and residents who are migrating to electric vehicles. We support the amendments most specific low one concerning fleet charging which we believe should be dealt with separately. Commercial, expansion of floats going forward. This fleet charging its separate from all the other merits of electric vehicle charge nothing san front we are supporting. Fleet charging will have a Significant Impact on both work and residents. And we want that were hoping that everyone can see to it that we can review that impact on our city and neighborhoods and workers. Under separate legislation. We support this. We work the amendments as they are presented and we thank you for your time. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon. Im chris cane im the Government Affairs lead with electricifiy america the Largest Network of fast charging stations in the United States. We support this ordinance in many ways conversion of autoinfrastructure and charging infrastructure and stroll line permitting process. However, we have concerns about the applicablity ofbive 726 and ab1236 requires cities to stroll line permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations. Ab1236 includes requirements jurisdiction must approve ev charging application by a Building Permit or nondiscretionary permit. The extent this ordinance revised zoning control tables to require conditional use authorization which it proposes. Not in compliance with 1236. Jurisdiction considering adopting cu permitting creating charging station when the use permit may be requested after the Building Official identified a specific adverse impact to health or safety as defined; is a concerning president. We agree the bureaucratic delays avoided and updating the planning code [inaudible] is a positive development. We wish to ensure a safe statute is submitted. We ask this committee amend in a way compliant with ab1236 and that would be by or moving conditional use authorization requirement. Policy that approves exiting process for autouses to ev charging stations remaining compliant with ab1236 is still public and positive for San Francisco. Thank you. Lets take the next caller if you would like to peek on item one, press star 3 to do so. Good afternoon supervisor and thank you for considering this legislation. Im joanaityis i represent ev go we commented last week. I want to reiterate the upon comments we made last week around the conditional use authorization process. Specifically by creating an overly challenging cu process the companies that are likely to be able to have the resources, money and time to comply are going to be the Largest Companies that have floats. What you are going to what that will result in smaller fleets will see this as one additional head wind. Will not have resources to perform all of the requirements of the complicated cu process and you will be penal iegz mall fleets and making them unable to electricifiy. We are hoping that the cu be recently. Our preference is we not have a cu process but we would recommend we the cu process follows the time lines and guidance. Thank you for sharing your comments that was the last caller in the queue. Public comment is now closed. I move the amendments. And on that motion supervisor peskin . Aye. Supervisor preston. Aye. Supervisor melgar . Aye. You have 3 ayes. That motion passes. Can i get a motion on the, move to the full board with a positive recommendation. On the motion to recommend as amended supervisor peskin. Aye. Supervisor preston. Aye. Supervisor melgar. Aye. 3 ayes. That motion passes. Okay. Madam clerk go on to item 2. Item 2 is an ordinance designating the california buckeye tree on mc alster as a landmark tree in making appropriate findings and directing the official acts of the landmark tree designation. Members who wish to provide comment on item 2 call 4156550001 meeting id 2485 132 7480 thank you. Wee have kelly growth from her office. Thank you Committee Members arc pol gees supervisor chan could not be here the california buckeye nominated bite urban foreevaluate council in 2018 this tree is unique. Native to San Francisco and loved by the community. And scheduled for removal in 99 due to neighborhood push back the construction was built around the tree to preserve temperature since the friends of urban foreevaluate cared for the tree and sprier chan is land is in trees of San Francisco. We ask for your support. Im happy to answer questions special the department of environment is also here on stand by. Thank you. Do we have questions or comments, colleagues . Lets go to Public Comment. Thank you, are there members of public had would like to speak on item 2 . Moving to the the call in line 4 listeners with one in the queue. Good afternoon im brian im the executive drushth for urban forest i want to comment in support of this landmark designation as kelly said, the california buckeye at 2694 mcallister is the oldest in San Francisco and the few native california street trees. If you have not seen the tree in person may i recommend an urban hike to take in what a beautiful species it is. Upon friends of urban forest has been proud to care for the tree via an easement in the 90s and the landmark will further protect this wonderful tree and a final thank you to supervisor chan and her staff for support in making this ordinance happen. Thank you. Thank you for sharing your comments. Are there members left in the queue . James . That was the last caller. Okay. Thank you. Public comment is closed. Id like to make a motion that we move this forward to the full board with a positive recommendation. On that motion supervisor peskin. Aye. Supervisor preston. Aye. Supervisor melgar. Aye. You have three ayes. That motion passes. Madam clerk, lets go to item 3, please. Item 3 is a resolution supporting mid pen housing submission ernldz the excess cites matching grants program to the department of house and Community Development to receive Program Funds to construct 100 affordable 91 multifamily affordable to low income including one resident manager unit state owned excess site 850 turk street. Member who is wish to comment should call 4156550001. Meeting id 2485 132 7480. If you have not done show and like to speak you need to press star 3. Madam chair . Thank you, madam clerk we have sheila here from the Mayors Office of housing and Community Development who would present. Welcome. Thank you. Good afternoon. Sheila with Mayors Office of housing commune development. Under 2019 order state agents identify parcels of state lands. There are 2 cites used as California Employment Development parking lots at 850 turk and 750 golden gate avenue identified for Affordable Housing in summer of 21 after responding to an rfp mid penthousing build affordable on the sites. Since then mid pen conducted communities out reach. Develops designs for cites and received approval for 260 units across the 2 cites including a class 32 exemption under ceqa. Gwen the significant number of units mid pen is moving with 850 turk and seeking public funding to fund the project it is in the receiving funding from other source solely from the state and other source. One key source is the states excess cites local government matching grants Program Requires a local matching funds. This Grant Program counts fee waivers as a match. In the resolution 100 affordable the eligible from waivers from the standard impact fees under planning code 406. Allows for fee waivers 100 affordable provide 80 ami or lower and for 55 years affordable. The project at 850 turks meets the crip tear enthusiasm early the team won a 10 million grants the max award from the states excess sites program. The state requires a resolution from the city demonstrating support and anticipated budget and verifying the fee waivers. The resolution before you release the 10 million in funds for the project and help developers finance capitol required. Move the project toward the target of 2024 construction. The development of the state land system a significant can win for san flan. A rare opportunity to produce 260 affordable unitos vacant parcels at no cost to the city. 91 u nitses on the first parcel will be available through the dahlia system. I have the member of the Development Team is here to field questions as well. Thank you. Thank you. Supervisor preston i believe this is in your district did you want it say anything . Thank you. Chair. I wanted to thank everyone for their work on this and be added as a cosponsor this happens to be in a block that was redistricted out of my district. I was disappointing because we worked closely and supportive of this Affordable Housing. We are excited see it moving forward and continue to support it and i trust we will have similar support and i know the cosponsored by supervisor stephanie in the direct the project lives. Look forward to support thanksgiving and being added as a cosponsor. Thank you. Thank you, supervisor preston. If there are no comments or questions colleagues, go to Public Comment on this item. Thank you, are there members withhold like to speak on item 3. Approach the podium. The public call in line . Looks like there are zero in the queue Public Comment is closed on this item. Id like to make a motion we forward this with a positive recommendation to the full board. On that motion priors peskin. Aye. Supervisor preston. Aye. Supervisor melgar. Aye. You have 3 ayes y. That passes. Colleagues. Madam clerk let me know i made the motion incorrectly for item 2. Which was go out as Committee Report and i did not specific low say that. I would like us to rescind that vote. And make a motion we reas i understand the vote for item 2 and just do it again. On the motion to rescind supervisor peskin. Aye. Supervisor preston. Aye. Supervisor melgar. Aye. You have 3 ayes thank you. I would like to make a motion we sends item 2 to the full board as a Committee Report with positive recommendation. On that motion supervisor peskin. Aye. Supervisor preston. Aye. Supervisor melgar. Aye. You have 3 ayes that passes. Thank you. Sorry about that. Madam clerk call item number 4. Would you like me 4, 5. Yes. Item 4 is resolution declaring intent of the board to order the c conditional vacation of vidal spree and gar sez and certain San Francisco puc Public Service easements in the parkmerced project development at 152 acre site located in the lake merced in Southwest Corner of San Francisco easement right in favor of the city and directoring the clerk to make trans mittals. Item 5 ordinance ordering the conditional vacation of portions of in the street vacation area and certain puc easements all within the mark merced project area. Authorizing the actions by the citys officials as specified. Members withhold like to speak on 4 and 5 need to dial 4156550001 if you have not done so and would like to speak you need to press star 3 and will indicate you raised your hand. Madam chair. Thank you. Colleagues, this is legislation is street vacations for parkmerced develop in district 7. You may remember this was in 2011 a long time ago. And this is the move am we are now seeing. I will have mr. John cher come up and tell what you is going on. I have slides. Thank you. Im Jonathan Cherry with Workforce Development. Here to describe items 4 and 5 and joined by staff from the department of public works. This legislation would implement asspekts of the parkmerced project the Development Agreement approved th