Transcripts For SFGTV LAFCo 102116 20161024 : vimarsana.com

Yes. Completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. Very good a motion to excuse supervisor mar motion in schematics and sxoufks. Approval the lafco minutes special meeting. Colleagues, any questions or comments about the minutes okay. Public comment is open on the lafco minutes and seeing no member of the public come forward Public Comment is closed. And motion to approve from commissioner pollock and commissioner campos and without objection. Were going a little bit out of order and so what call item 5 first if we can do. Work plan for treatment and the general landscaping a cooperated and operated in the city and county of San Francisco. At the last lafco meeting an idea how we could look at the city and how the city takes responsibility in maintaining trees we have different jurisdictions the work plan will be ignored to study how to bring the tree maintenance into one jurisdiction our chief executive officer. Jason fried, executive officer. I know with is where a time crunch with time issues over 2 oclock in your packet going into how to look at t streetscaping so phase one is 4 to 5 months a lot of interviews and research and questioning of the agencies and reviewing how the jurisdiction deal with the issue of mandatory departments doing similar work and try to merge the process or San Francisco is doing to correctly and no more work to be done once that phase is done depending on the details a month or two to write and report depending on the detail and phase three something weve looked at and resolved and no more work a future local Agency Formation commission will deal with that. Thank you and im not clear of the 5 points maybe that might be a little bit long for a report and also important that we build on the work by the urban Forestry Council there is a report they have i think the report extends into the year 2030 how to take care of our trees but under a different jurisdiction to with that, we have colleagues other questions or concerns to be raised about the plan commissioner pollock thank you mr. Fried the scope of work is gathering the information that takes four or five months then a discrimination made if a formal report. The question how much like there are a lot of other reports that are out there so to a degree did i find a lot of information that is to be looked at from a different angle maybe longer but something short and sweet not much difference in what which is covered a shorter report one of the reasons up to 5 months were going into the holidays to we are anticipating a future one of the things d c a at the end of this year or next year an in depth of the future plan and updating that and other aspects of the cpa program i gave middleincome time and maybe focusing on the cac to be realistic with my workload i would anticipate it takes 5 months i could get that done quicker. Got it so green house yourselves the time not late but also knowing that is not four to five months of fulltime. Parttime work while im working on the cca. That make sense. Did i mention the elephant in the room in the room ask is ruby next year and people are volunteering so i think the report should be ignored something that can be ignored vertebral to the board of supervisors to and people to spend what we can do in gentrificational influence in the city ill put that out as a hope but no control over that in my mind we want representatives here and this report can help guide them as their movng into the next work plan for this organization. Correct one of the goals ive talked to outlet folks at the board of supervisors and worked on street trees issues and other aspects ive talked with the offices to get information all over the place engaged of time them so depending on what occurs on the november elections well be able to determine what is going on with future commissioners. Okay. Great so that item anyone wish to comment and seeing none, Public Comment is closed. And so basically, you want to motion to give you the go ahead to do this report . Okay. That motion moved by commissioner campos and seconded by commissioner pollock and without objection thank you lets go on to our next item which will be ignored number 4. Item 4 hearing on how to connect fiber to all resident and businesses. Jason fried, executive officer. Well invited department of the environment we have a power point presentation not utilities that given the timeframe but any questions hell be able to reference that. Snooemz a bryan and with the department of technology and like to thank the commission for inviting us here today, i want to talk about an effort were engaged in we call it for San Francisco and seeking Advisory Services how to move forward the Guiding Principles are equity that every resident and business has access to fast and Affordable Services and that will increase the local employment and Economic Development jajz and insuring we have a network that is future prove that can be expanded over time just context this project grew out of Research Efforts one by the budget analyst and the report in march president different options wanting the broadband for the city and ct did cost modeling and worked with the d l a costing some of the options and this initiative has been opportunity two the Capital Improvement plan and committee on Information Technology for the Advisory Services supported by d t but it is going to be implemented by public works were seeking to hire a project manager which has the reason for this i think broadband especially from the options were commissioner Vice President moran is project construction and the it and the heavy lift the construction key doing the digging, the stripg on poles that kind of thing both a an it and construction but the heavy lift with the construction piece the purpose of Advisory Services seeking technology Advisory Services and comparing public and private and public option public is the status quo and so the Advisory Group will recommend and approach gordons brief Decision Makers for displacement and forums on this recommendation from the city decided to proceeded with the public option it will gave me in the procurement and emphasis this is a little bit different many features of this project will be ignored new no other by city the size of San Francisco has engaged in this ambitious project those cities have many of them a little bit smaller us have a unit for electrical utilities as well just a quick question what is the body that is doing the you mentioned d t and public works but is there an advisory body you mentioned the services so for the project who is making decisions about were reporting to Capital Planning and will be ignored thats sort of the Advisory Group cumber. So the Capital Planing Committee. Yeah. In terms of 6 you know we talk about private that is one thing obviously public means another publicprivate could be kind of lots of forums. Exactly. So do you have a sense of belonging what those forums can be ignored at this point . Right there is two primary types those are new one is an approach that has been tried in a couple of cities alabama and maryland the city owns the fiber in the streets call it dark fiber and engages with the isp in west minister google fiber have thought in the electronics and do the Customer Service and provide the connection to the internet the approach the city deals with the infrastructure and the private partners deals with the shorter Term Investments in a number of equipment and so forth and the Customer Service center. They lease the use of the private and the leases are structured they pay for on a per pga each home or best that the Company Passes have to pay a certain amount per month the formula is different in the jurisdictions but thats the model so the i f p pays for the opportunity to serve a customer and in the case of west minority they pay an a firm will design and build and the city will maintain the ownership and that hadnt been tested in the United States yet there is a discussion of it in utah on assess called utopia has gone through a few considerations and theyre looking to model to arrive that effort to get more capital for it but enough of the member cities have agreed to go forward with that model yet so those are the two models weve look at it and the pricing exercise on the publicprivate side. I guess im not clear can you explain the defense between the two if we have the city providing dark fiber and the i f p provides the electronics i dont know the difference between the approach where the city owns it but it is designed built and operateed and it is in the financing of dark fiber piece in the first model the were not there yet minority hunts model the city will eventually pay for the takes the reflex for installing the infrastructure the fiber infrastructure on the concessioner approach the city will be making a payment guaranteed payment through a private developer that would finance that more in the financing you can your right a hybrid two approaches that is just the example if we focus the modeling in the cost effort the d o a focuses the report that is underlined we have an opportunity to take the best from both. Any examples in the country there is a totally public version. We do chattanooga is an example and lafayette and louisiana many month of them municipal electrical utilities it gotten in there are a few not the case sandy oregon has a standalone i f p. So youll be able to provide like different ways to do those different oppositions how much appetite for the rest of them this is was it phase one will be ignored flushing out a question from commissioner pollock. Thank you for coming to speak with us i have two quick questions one how does the sfpuc play into this with cleanpowersf or is that something that youll flush out with the option. I think it is something well flush out. Great, great i wanted to make sure that was on the radar and the second im not familiar with the Capital Planing Committee we have a number of advocates that come to bosco that expressed an interest in the broadband i wonder in the made up of Capital Committee has this retention im not sure of the make up. It is city departments that participate. Okay so for example, on lafco im the public person and none not part of city departments. Ill need to check or the board is represented in the Mayors Office but ill need to check. It is pretty much 9 Department Heads that deal with the investment last week puc and airport and then the president of the board serves think the Capital Improvement committee and generally the president of the board staff if theres other you know offices like the board of supervisors participate that and lafco is not part of that it is neat to commissioner tang the dynamics but the composition by the charter. That make sense i just wasnt familiar with it so i think this making sure that we tie them and put it on their radar theyre watching this meeting thank you. So the scope for this project is going to be 3 phases one is with the developing not saying it should happen in the first 4 months thats defining one of the options weve talked about and the second is assistance for repairing and viewing and a request based on the analysis we decided to for the record with a publicprivate option the same Advisory Group will help us with the procurement and the third to be assistant and negotiations with by vendors in that case the second phase vendors to help with the systems wallow go with the public or publicprivate approach so the rfp were still reviewing the responses so that the rfp for 9 Advisory Services. Im sorry for the Advisory Services and. And we continued to select a vendor in december and went over the first two phases and phase one is dependent phase one and that was my presentation ill be happy to answer any questions you may have. I know that jason asked. We have to be brief so perhaps mr. Recorded individual followup well ask month presentation and if commissioner pollock wants to do that she can double up with me in my office to be able to have. Ill be happy to. That will be ignored a meeting wouldnt it so well have to stage that. You could do two not 3 thats a meeting. Got you. Okay. Okay. Ill defer to you. Thank you on the composition of the meeting but my Contact Information is on the first page. Thank you, mr. Robert so open up for Public Comment anyone wish to comment and seeing none, Public Comment is closed. And this is just information item so we can go on to the next item. Aggregation status update on the cleanpowersf and Program Launch and status on the procedures even if California Public Utilities Commission given our timeframe for today what i have i have an email from the director the cca program ill for the record forward that are incorporated inform save time not read into the record but a copy to the clerk part of official file if it is acceptable to everybody. Any Public Comment . The executive officers report report seeing none, none. This is item the cca report. On item number 3 none coming forward for opinion Public Comment is closed. And on to the next item. Item 6 chovts. Jason fried, executive officer. The only thing given the timeframe the next meeting december 9th that is the last of this calendar year unless it means special meetings added to the agenda weve share supervisor campos will be ignored their last meeting we look forward to seeing you and well be able to have a full meeting have a long discussion of lafco. Okay. Thank you. Okay Public Comment on the executive officers report is now open and seeing none, Public Comment is closed. And good evening to the next item. Item 7 Public Comment. General Public Comment is now open and so no one is coming forward for Public Comment Public Comment is closed. Go on to did next item and item 8 future agenda. Colleagues weve talked about the fortune future and lack of future for some of us well close Public Comment and our last item. Item 9 adjournment. Were adjourned thank you, madam clerk really glad to have you here for this dedication ceremony for the new air Traffic Control tower at sfo well begin our speaking portion and spanned a welcome to michael administrator. clapping. thank you very much and good morning San Francisco and. Morning. Im delighted to be back in any home state of california and i want to begin by welcoming everyone who took time out from in their busy schedules to join us today what were celebrating a significant milestone it is a significant milestone for the faa and San Francisco International Airport city and county of San Francisco and for the millions and millions of travelers that pass there to at t park every year it is undertaking and completion was the result of something unique a unique Partnership Im wondering talk about that in just a moment before i do that i want to recognize some distinguished guests wave or youre all standing wave when i call your name alice if Nancy Pelosis office alex there he is. clapping. Karen Chapman for congresswoman aaron. clapping. okay kathleen deputy for jackie spier and, of course, my great friend the honorable mayor ed lee. clapping. and mayor, i have to take a moment and thank you for eyes and ears to represent the u. S. Conference of mayors as we look at the next century of aviation my history with San Francisco at t park goes back a way to the 1980s and early 1990s when i lived here and executive director of port of San Francisco San Francisco is changed a lot since then and so has this airport those days you even though emigrate feeling when you come into that building you stepped into an architecture digest spread as stroll through certain parts of airport including the spot were gathered in with this incredible view of the tower that is rising upright behind us here now San Francisco has proven that infrastructure can be fundamental and eloquent at the same time as faa administrator i objective find myself reflecting on the big Infrastructure Projects as much as how important that these investments are to our National Economy and aviation and era space are 5 percent of t