Considered in closed session. Any Public Comment . I dont see any Public Comment is closed. Item 2 consider adoption of a motion on whether or not to assert the attorney clooib client privilege with legal council. So commissioners youll need to make a motion to conduct into closed session. Commissioner moore. Move to assert attorneyclient privilege. Second. Thank you on that motion po to assert and move into commission. Commissioner antonini commissioner moore commissioner wu commissioner Vice President richards and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero and if give me a moment ill lock the doors well start convening in open session for item 4 following the closed session the Planning Commission in open session will report on any action during the closed session and consider a motion regarding whether to disclose no action taken during that closed session so i dont know if you want to report think outside the box 0 officially. Commissioner wu. Ill leave to the president s report to report but move not no disclose. Second. Second. No action during closed session. Thank you commissioner wu on that motion to not disclose any part of the discussion commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner wu commissioner Vice President richards and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero. Okay. Jonas and to the members of the public apologize for running a little bit late we were in closed session well take a quick lunch break be back in about thirty minutes. Very good thank you, commissioners commissioners. Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the regular meeting of the San FranciscoPlanning Commission francisco Planning Commission for thursday, april 21, disruptions of any kind. Proceedings. And when speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. Id like to call roll at this time. Commissioner president fong commissioner Vice President richards commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore commissioner wu and commissioner johnson is sent present and will be joining us first for items proposed for continuance for ab and noriega are listed for continuance the new proposal is to may 12, 2016, case 2 minute street large project authorization is proposed for continuance until may 12, 2016, item 3 multiple properties owned or by the Art Institute city and county of San Francisco is promoted middle may 12, 2016, item 4 south van ness is 26th conditional use authorization proposed for june 2016 item 5 for case the Hotel Conversion informational presentation you requested on this date proposed definitely as a result of the cases not projected to not being heard on may 12th we want to commend come up those together and commissioners further under argue discretionary calendar 18 ab and 16 through 36 grant avenue as long as the place discretionary review the project sponsor and others have requested a continuance not opposed until may 12, 2016. There are no speaker cards. Any Public Comment on the continuance calendar. Yeah. My name is george i urge you to think this number 4 and just like not do this it is basically another luxury condo that the Mission Street didnt need and with all the homelessness in the news and the murder of a gentleman it is not right we need to build Affordable Housing keep it diverse and affordable id like to remind the members of the audience that the commission does not tolerate disruptions of any kind. Your comments should be limited to the matter of continuance. Good afternoon. My name is a eric the president of the quatro district were here to support the continuance of the project an south van ness we are in the prosecutes of pleading you are special use district which we are developing into for consideration by the board of supervisors were also concerned that the Environmental Review for the project has not been completed we requested to look at the impacts of the project of the latino clurlt like the Small Businesses weve not seen that and have a Community Wide planning process that is happening right now in 2020 make sure all those are completed before this comes to the commission thank you. Hi my name is marie with the quatro the project is currently we want would like a continuance ill say a straightforward it is the biggest in the pipeline one and plus units the project if approved would eliminate all pdrs that are there are currently the mission is losing a lot of pdr we want it continued. Any Public Comment on item the matters of continuance i dont see any Public Comment is closed. Commissioner moore. As proposed to the dates with the revised dates with the additional terms 18 ab to may 12th. Second. Thank you, commissioners to continue items commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner wu commissioner Vice President richards and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero Zoning Administrator, what say you . Continue the dates as proposed and specified auto campfires under our consent calendar calendar, are considered to be routine and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests in which event the matter shall be removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. Commissioners under the rules of c p item 6 must be pulled off of content well hear that at the beginning of calendar the remaining items are 7 ab for the cases at 1544 irving street and the discretionary review and the Zoning Administrator will consider variances and case 8 on Market Street the conditional use authorization and item 9 at 2324 Market Street also a conditional use authorization there are no speaker cards any Public Comment on item items 6, 7 ab or 9. Consent calendar okay i dont see any Public Comment is closed. Commissioner Vice President richards. My residence i own 2324 Market Street i ask to be recused. Very good then well need a motion to rouse commissioner Vice President richards from item 9 a move to rouse commissioner Vice President richards from item 9 a thank you commissioners on that motion to rouse commissioner Vice President richards from item 9 a commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner wu commissioner Vice President richards commissioner president fong thank you commissioner Vice President richards i dont think there is any deliberations. Commissioner toursarkissian is commissioner antonini. Yeah. We have should move to approve 7 ab separately. Absolutely. Second. Thank you commissioners on that motion to approve 7 ax and 8 under the consent calendar commissioner antonini. And 8. 7 b by the Zoning Administrator. Okay. Thank you i. Commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner wu and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero on item 9 under the consent calendar do we have a motion. No. We dont deliberate. I should have voted on the last one. Move to approve. Oh, yeah. I laughter . Okay thank you commissioner hillis on that motion to approve item 9 under the consent calendar commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson exposure commissioner wu and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero. On item 7 b grant the variance. Thank you Zoning Administrator. Commissioners, that places you under your under commission matters item 10 draft minutes for march 21 and april 7th of 2016. Okay. Is there any any Public Comment on draft minutes. Any georgia swedish here to comment on the 31st of march i guess item 8 kemper lands aim embarrassed that is the the short things on sunday morning president versus precedence in setting the minutes i talked with accident cd e nc e he talked about the precedent of the lot merge to summarize the lot merge was unnecessarily in that neighborhood those reductions in the zoning the project was out of characterization and demolition of sound more Affordable Housing and those are this 4 precedence i talk about so the distinction im making between what was written in the minutes and the precedence is you housing should have a precedence but im not talking about the presents im sorry i would have written earlier he read this this morning. Dully noted. Thank you. I appreciate that thats my point thank you. President and Vice President have imagined that. Commissioner Vice President richards. Move to approve the minutes as adjusted. Second. Thank you, commissioners on that motion to adopt the minutes as amended commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner wu commissioner Vice President richards and commissioner president fong thank you, commissioners so moved, commissioners, that motion passes 7 to zero and commissioners, that places you under your on item 11 commissioners questions or comments. Commissioner Vice President richards. A couple of quick things the new york city is going what were going introduce in terms of Affordable Housing with a mandated to increase the density bonus in the sunday New York Times were structuring are the segregation talking about go hive segregated areas if we dont have people move in not have the same race their segregated but marketrate for Affordable Housing requirement it talks about the amount of the dominant minority leaving priced out of the neighborhood its a an interesting article the takeaway the answer for new york and maybe for San Francisco you built the affordable when you build the marketrate housing and keep as many people there with some type of preference and a expectation to make sure the race of people a great article if you havent read that and i mentioned this i believe 1601 mission with the congratulations and the fuel cars are a classics in the New York Times it talked about a large manhattan now not having a huge island of cars but people having to drive many, many miles out of their way to get the gas gas and we never thought about it all the prices went up all the gas stations are going out of business with no gas stations left those are the two things. Seeing number further departmental matters drouchlts. Report in the interest of time and view of the board of appeals and the Historic Preservation commissi commission. Good afternoon aaron starr, manager, legislative affairs for the Planning Department staff first at the land use hearing the bio annual balance report the commission heard and the land use staff presented the report to the Land Use Committee there was no significant comments from the committee or public at the end that was to the full board to accept the report. Excuse me. Second on the agendas supervisor peskin and supervisor kims origin pour the project with 25 units or more info the trailing legislation this june the Planning Commission heard this on march 31 and recommended approval also with the support from the Affordable Housing in the city now describe the commissioners requested amendments by the legislative sponsors the commissions ask to rove vague language to achieve higher affordability with the density law the sponsors didnt make this flexibility was asked for the onsite requirement that allows a portion of the units to be for the low income households or moderate households the sponsors made the change the commission ask for a grandfathering provision regardless of the building type the sponsor didnt make thanksgiving changes over one hundred and 40 feet are innovate required to use the grandfathering provision the commission ass suicide inform uniform the sponsors made the change the carve outs for the family zone and from the Union District to rove the pdr prior to the hearing at the hearing supervisor peskin made a motion to remove the nct carve out it passes and the commission asked for a grandfathering for 3 years after planning approve instead of a hard date of september 15th at change was not made the Planning Commission required to initiative angle provision for the market rate housing for the future Feasibility Study the specific chase change was not made with the board of supervisors look at the Feasibility Study the commission asked so when a project sponsor uses the state density bonus any Feasibility Study should not relate to the projects density but instead tied to the incentives and concessions with state law and the sponsors made the change the Commission Requested Amendments to the small site acquisitions with the mohcd with the existing program and the sponsors made this change the commission requested the districts should be tiered four grandfathering and permits the sponsor this have the grandfathering provision, however, advertent and inadvertently and the permits were such that some requirements are lower than in the grandfathering provision the commission requested the middleincome and moderate income be consistently extended it was not an issue and exempting of any project approved by the planning by june 7th for any higher fees the sponsors made changes and now projects that are approved including the potential appeals and or january 12th of this year the commission requested technical amendments and it was made the Land Use Committee was lengthy and the regular Committee Members were joined by at the supervisor kim and supervisor farrell and the discussion of the a discussion between the resolution that priority did guidelines it was passed by the board of supervisors amazing during the hearing 6 amendments ive covered two previously those includes one by supervisor peskin to remove the carve outs for projects in the mission and add a more consistency with mohcd Small Site Program and those were approved unanimously chair cohen offered two amendments from supervisor farrell with additional grandfathering provisions to grandfather Development Projects at a 50. 5 inclusion rates for the period after january 2016 or january 6, 2016, there was approved unanimously and that the inclusionary rates for the housing Development Projects approved the executive agreement before adjoin 7 demonstrating it is outside for the costahawkins rental housing act that was approved by supervisor wiener and supervisor cowen by dissented by for the grandfathered provision including that projects that are filed an environmental application prior to january 1st, 2016, should provide with the same inclusionary rules and an additional impact fees for the special use district for the project theres in the grandfather this passed anonymously and again, the projects will be heard at the land use hearing at the full board supervisor wiener ordinances that would amend Code Enforcement paced the second reading and the redevelopment for the transbay project is one passed its facing the rising sun of our new day begun, or First Reading and the general plan for the downtown area map 5 for blocks one and two also passed its second reading and there were no new introductions that concluded my report. Commissioner antonini. Thank you for your report to clarify it sounds like all the grandfathering that we had asked to be applied evenly across the city was taken up and approved by the committee the Land Use Committee with the exception felt one hundred and 20 part of it. Thats correct yeah. And i guess the hard date they have a hard date for the grandfathering projects i guess pulled their permits i forgot what. December 8th. December 8th of the particular year and then there is a move to possibly have projects approved before january 12th of this year to be considered under the rules then in effect. Okay yes. There is poeblthsd of changes for the full board but thats what is going to the full board this time. Unless they make more amendments between now and that date. Thank you. Commissioner moore. Mr. Sta