Here. Commissioner caen . Commissioner courtney herehere. Commissioner kwon . Here. Present vietor. Here. Commissioner kane is the budget in more recent years has actually increased from 2 million to 5 million. Expected shortlyand the kilowatts installed remained high. Over 2000 kw per year. Commissioner courtney will not be able to be here today. On the next slide you can see the total that are impacted by pg e and on the mme. Sec. Next item please. Left side you can see the item number three is approval of the minutes of payouts on this you see this august 9, 2016 all those in favor say, aye. Opposed, nay the motion passes more so in the recent years and the participation of the installers is what you see here with the installers this unanimously. Mme. Sec. Can you call item for please . Item 4 is gen. Public has been very good in the comments. Members of the beginning especially with the market share. It is happening in a general public may address the market context. California commission on matters that puc took a look at the incentive programs that it has been running in 2015. Are within the commissions it summarized here are the jurisdiction and are not on results of that i think its todays agenda. Important to realize that the California PublicUtility Commission achieved its goal of Widespread Adoption now,the way that the watershed is at crystal on a selfsustaining market. We also took a look at what was happening with our public owned utility patriots. Thats what we are showing on this slide. Springs measures are taken all of the programs that we to protect it and we have a have showed on the bay area system, a unique system and we have a gentleman here who and this area as well. Or, they fully subscribe so they are not available to has been working on that customers. We took specific since 1993 and i have been looking at this since 1998 rebates and incentives for solar programs. They are declining and going to zero. The stabilizing factor i vigorously. Water is going to be a resource that we cannot play with. Now, i know you have some experts here. It mentioned earlier that is the tax credit. The tax credit, the 30 federal tax is the year 2016 and we flush our toilets and we have clean Drinking Water and credit has been extended and it says a lot for the city. The cpuc pass favorable net when we look at the Sea Level Rise and the Climate Change and this that and the Energy Metering terms for customers installing solar other we need to conserve in their homes. We had a water and we need to use it for the right things. I am series of meetings and those here to ask you commissioners, that if any changes are made to the are noted here. And, we got watershed that you waited some feedback and answer questions. Now, for the proposed changes. Invite the [inaudible] to the table [timer dings] it we propose to integrate the cleanpowersf and is very simple. You do not need to be a rocket gosolarsf pprogram and we have by going through scientist. They reserved Enrollment Period have all of that water for our the last 200 years and now signed up tto be a someone will come along for cleanpowersf customer or go the next 30 years and screw solarsf customer in waiting it up. I know that you commissioners have the or youre already a gumption to do the right cleanpowersf program. With thing. Thank you very much. Emphasis on becoming a super go to the board of supervisors. Thank you. Any other general Public Comment at green cleanpowersf customer. And not only that but we establish metering rates and terms for our customers. The commission went ahead and established them earlier this year. But in addition this time . Next item super green customers would please. That next item is item 5; receive the highest rate because they are paying the communications. Highest rate so you have an do we have anypublic added incentive if you will because of the energy that you generate from your solar system that spills to the grid. Comment on communications . Good afternoon. Good afternoon. I am here we are also proposing to to speak on behalf of the continue to Foster Program stability by simplifying the go solar sf incentives to one dollar per kilowatt instead of a complex table water review from your state board and that is required that we currently have. We for the state law. And i am are proposing to step down all of the incentives to reflect the lower cost of the solar that we saw. It here to verify that this is a comprehensive and complete report on the annual report. I wanted to extend that information to you. Last year we gave some significant comments to mr. Is time to recognize that is cheaper to install solar wade and his team and they today and we should just our incentive programs down as a result. We are proposing to step incentive payments down responded to those incorporated those and i for customers by small think it shows leadership in increments. Predictability the overall status so thank is important for the Stakeholder Community so you. Thank you for your having a casual step down is helpful. We propose a step comments. Yes, i thought it was a very impressive report. I thought so too. I dont see him here so down of 100 per kilowatt thank you very much on your comments on the report. Any other comments on communications . Mme. City clerk, item 6 please. Item 6 is other commission this year. We are really strengthening support for business. Seeing none, mme. City clerk please read item 7. Low income residents. We think that is an important focus area for us. The state of california does item 7 is Citizens Advisory Commission or your this for their low Income Customers and we intend to do the same. The additional report. Good afternoon pres. Vietors and commissioners and i am here today to support we would propose for low Income Customers would be to develop an inverter replacement program. The report for the cac. I am solar installation community was very good at getting out to low income households in San Francisco when the Program First started. So we have a lot of systems for proud to say that the cac low income roofs. As that attended a cac retreat. During the retreat we system would age the first thing that will go as the inverters. We are anticipating that some of those low income households obtained our purpose of the will need help addressing subcommittees for 2016 and the inverter issues and we would like to propose changes to the program that would allow some incentives 2015the cac members have for that component of the program as well. Let me ask you some questions. Sure. I have heard that some of those older homes are not Strong Enough to hold the weight. How do we get them to strengthen the structure itself to accommodate that . The executive Management Team showed us the priorities over the 2015 2016 team and we have not ent as far as to help the low income residents to improve their housing but we encourage you can see more about our priorities through the water power and wastewater subcommittees in 20162017 they contact the mayors that were identified during our retreat. We will office of housing they offer continue to work with the general manager and the assistance for those sorts executive Management Team to provide prior input on these of things and that can be a things that were identified. Big cost for individuals that live in San Francisco said the Mayors Office of i work with staff and the board has appointments 48 out of 13 of our other appointments. In addition housingword definitely the board appointed members out when a donna and steve provide assistance for those mckenney who was just who want to do that and need those components. Appointed last friday. We do have people in the pipeline for eight, nine, and 10. In april after the committee adopted a resolution to honor the life finally, there are some Technology Changes that we would like to consider incentivizing. We would like to develop of espinal jackson, the complementary distributed Energy Programs perhaps for Energy Storages or for electric vehicle or vehicle to grid technologies. We would like to have the commission acknowledged what abilities to make those kind ms. Jackson had done first city. Im happy to say that her followed in her of Administrative Changes mothersfootsteps. This was passed on tuesday and it was brought to the cac last with the changes that we are making and proposing to the board of supervisors. Because, that is what we will have to do next. In month on october 20. We order to do any changes at the magnitude that we are talking about, we need to go to the board of supervisors and get the underlying legislation change so we have the authority. And so, we are proposing is part of the next steps to work with the City Attorney to will continue to monitor and finalize ordinance changes evaluate the use of these and come back to you in october with what those particulars are and we would be on a schedule then and we Innovative Strategies to would meet with the board in engage with the the latter part of this year and hopefully be in a position to be able to implement the changes in january 2017. And so, the next gosolarsf year we would stakeholders. We had an open house and our powers subcommittee had a meeting like to implement those led by our district 6 representative mark connors. Changes. That is the end of my presentation im happy to lastly, i want to thank answer any questions. On the net Energy Commissioner moran, and we are happy that commissioner metering are those rates currently in force . Did we adopt them at some point . Yes, you adopted them. I have them in my notebook and they are accessible on the website. In terms of people knowing that piece of the pie, as to moller will be joining our the weather they know what meeting next week. And that is it. Those numbers are. Thank you. Thank you for yes. One thing that i would like to see is the question your service. And that was good work. Any Public Comments on of benefits i would love to your cac report . Hearing done next item please. Item 8 is report of the get that when we are general manager. Presented with the actual resolutions and understand that so we can be the ambassadors and have our talking points on why this good afternoon makes sense. Obviously, that would be commissioners. The first thing that i would like to different for the consumers do is update you on the land and the board of supervisors. I think for use committee. This was a meeting that was held yesterday and it was a the board one of the issues resolution that was passed about the peninsula is how you make cleanpowersf as competitive as you can watershed. So if you could and having that type of come up steve and give us an program is a clean power update. Exclusive i think is Steve Ritchie with power important and i expect to be important to the board. Yes and even appointments and water. A resolution yesterday urged the puc to like that even with the audience could we accelerate some of our goals with clean power and solar by combining them with either jobs are projections or renewables. Then, potentially we could authorize the resolution. We provided info to the puc procure Additional Energy more quickly. I dont know if theres anything in there that we could lift up. I think one of the things that was brought up at the stakeholders meeting was the fact that they want us to be cautious because of super green will satisfy another percent of gas free energy and then the reluctance e of adding solar on top of that and we could get some education on that if you have a moment . We have some bill analysis for folks that are considering solar on their roof and we were able to demonstrate that for them, which is in our Capital Program that we are working if we put solar owner with combined with our super green product they actually save money overall quite on right now. It also requires the puc to provide substantially and it was a report by october 17th important for them to combine the steps and super detailing the existing conditions of the watershed green presentation. We did hear from some of the super plan. I think it is clear to the board that we do need green meetings a nervousness additional analysis and we of is super green combined with that product. I certainly can show some examples of that in our consider that part of the presentation when we come plan. You will be moving down that path but its very back. Hard to accelerated and what thank you. Appreciate that. That be great. Super green is still great is required of the plan. The from a carbon standpoint if i want to reduce my bill than the solar part helps. Right. And the Net Energy Meeting piece of that contributes to that. Watershed does go further than that. The two year any other questions . Any Public Comment on this . Thank you. Plan does not include the funding for operating a trail budget system. We will bring that to you at the next budget meeting when hi, jason fried executive that would open and 2019. Officer for lascaux and i will just try to highlight these very quickly i just we do plan to come back to think we should very seriously belooking at gosolar sheres fno reason we should be getting to those who are staying with the commission in 2017 with a plan review and we plan to provide an overview of the watershed trails plan and this was provided at the memo of your last meeting. We will come back in the near future at your next meeting or to. I would be happy to answer any questions that you might have about that but i think this is very significant for us as the puc. So the plan would pg e and i think that you accelerate the process . Will slowly slip away from seeing anyone whois not a it would implement the low Income Customer getting those funds but if youre watershed plan. Not a low income you should has there been be about super green price. Communication with this the little bit left of board with this plan . Electricity that you might by you still would need to there has been discussion have solar on your roof. We and there are commissioners should be creating a Sister Program for Energy Efficiency and e vehicles and thathave given us the access. Several types of programs that are similar to gosolarsf and get people i just wanted to inform you that this is happening. Trained on how you get trained on this type of energy and i think without although, it is not on the having it come from the Power Enterprises budget agenda so you may not want to discuss it as much. We itselfyou could be looking at money from the state and are doing whatever we can to make sure that whatever is adopted is consistent with the plan. You will let the there are funds you could commission know if theres apply for and i guess those funds you can get on the federal level. I dont know. I havent looked on the federal side but if you anything additional . Guys got really creative you yes. And, we will provide that could work with the other programs and they cut gets you not only to solar panels to the board. Any other questions commissioners on this . Okay, but all of these other angles and now youhave all thank you. Please keep us informed even if there is no action needed. Now we will have given this Affordable Energy from all these different places and now we dont have jobs coming from one different update on cleanpowersf. Place but from three different places. From good afternoon, commissioners we are years ago, we know who they are and they should be an easy sell. The harder part currently serving 300 for them is its going to be locations and we have an opt a matter of them being used to a smaller bill by now but hopefully a lot of those customers should be in the super green thing and you get all of your energy from out rate of 1. 9 and not 100 renewable and you can last year was 1. 8 so weve seen a slight increase but do those things on your inside encourage you to move forward with gosolarsfand we have the and no harm no foul opt outperiod that has concluded. Are super green [timer dings]support this program. Thank you. Next speaker and and green are now down to 6 . So we have acquired some of them as well. Kelly please hican you please introduce has approved a contract for yourself . Through go solar sf we renewable energy. The have managed to grow the careers of a lot of individuals. 50 of our crew leads our Workforce Development and recently our first gosolarsf workforce Customer Program notification is being sent out in batches. The first two batches have gone out. We are planning on enrolling about 73,000 service locations. So, i just told Development Higher the came you that we currently have 7300 a so this is a big step through door andwere able to for us. About 8000 of those buy a home with gosolarsf. So now the state is saying that we need a better and more robust low Income Customers of receive them so far and weve received 49 up out and 53 from super green in that process. How many again . Component in San Francisco was already on the end guard so you guys are already ahead of the game and it is fun to see people playing so out of those 8000 we catchup to where san got 49 opt outs and53 francisco is. I support cleanpowersf and integrating gosolarsf into it. I have concerns that the bill savings upgrades. We are currently planning our spring enrollment. We are currently planning on doing that in may