Can mays hold on the power and americas special relationship survive President Trump . You say that President Trump that has an affection to britain. It doesnt seem like the british people have an affection for him. And north korea fires yet another missile. Our options are effective and overwhelming. Has this brinksmanship put us on the edge of war . That question for National Security adviser h. R. Mcmaster. Well break down the politics, smoke out the spin. The facts that matter this week. Good morning. As we come on the air this week, there is breaking news on the terror attack in london. A subway explosion that left 30 injured. A second arrest overnight. A 21yearold man in london. That comes on top of a teenager also in custody. Isis claimed responsibility for the attack. Britain on the highest state of alert. Braced for more. The mayor of london warning the public to remain vigilant. The attack at the height of rush hour friday morning. Just after i landed in london for my interview with Prime Minister theresa may. We reported the breaking news on gma, speaking with two eyewitnesses who described the panic on the subway as a fireball burst through the carriage. Just a few hours later, i arrived at 10 doing street for my conversation with the Prime Minister. She joined us in Winston Churchi lrk ls old bedroom after a series of briefs and also tweets from President Trump. He tweeted that the people were, in the sights of Scotland Yard. Is that true . I dont think speculation is good. The police and the security agencies have doing the work necessary to discover the full circumstances of this cowardly attack thats taken place. And to identify all responsible. Im pleased to say our Emergency Services were on the scene of the attack immediately. And, once again, i admire and thank them for their professionalism and bravery. The rest of the city has carried on. You said in the wake of the other attacks, enough is enough. Things need to change. Its time for some embarrassing conversations. What did you mean by that . It is necessary for us, to look, as we are doing, at whether our police and Security Services have the powers that they need. The full capabilities. We review after any incident takes place. We have had sadly a number of terrorist attacks this year in the uk. Do they have to powers they need . The exercise is being done. Ive given them extra powers. When i was hoim secretary before i became Prime Minister. We look again, but one of the issue that we really need to be addressing, ill be raising this, when im at the United Nations, is the question of the use of the internet by terrorists. For terrorist planning. And also, the using it for the spread of extremism. Of hatred. Propaganda that can inspire and incite terrorism. Are you going to need Companies Like facebook and google to do more . Were talking to them about doing more. And, indeed, companies have come together and formed a global forum to look what they can do to deal with this quickly and in a better way than they do at the moment. So were working with the companies. President trump also tweeted this morning that the solution is a bigger, tougher travel ban. Thats an idea you have been against. Is it something you would reconsider . I think what is important is that were able to have the powers to look into people, to identify people who may be wanting to cause us harm and are plotting to cause us harm. And to be able to take the necessary action when people do cause us harm. As it happens, here in the United Kingdom, when i was home secretary, i banned more extremist hate preachers, i excluded more extremist hate preachers from coming to the uk than any home secretary before. Including richard spencer, involved this charlottesville, was banned. We want to talk about that now with the president s National Security adviser, general h. R. Mcmaster. Thank you for joining us. You heard the Prime Minister there. She was surprised at the president saying Scotland Yard hat the perpetrators in their sights. Where did the president get that information . The president was communicating something not surprising at all. Law enforcement professionals have these organizations under scrutiny. Not these individuals. Whats great about the relationship with the United Kingdom is how closely we Work Together to gain visibility of these networks and understand how theyre trying to infiltrate into our own countries and place our own citizens at risk. To be clear, the president did not know from any intelligence that he had that scotlandons every day. Try to map them every day. And what we learned after the mass murder attacks of 9 11, is that integration of our effort, between overseas intelligence operations, domestic law enforcement, working with international partners, is one of the most important ways to protect the American People and really to protect all civilized peoples from these murders. You heard the Prime Minister say we have to find new ways to cut off the terrorists use of the internet. That echoes something the president was treating friday nong as well. What does he have in mind . Hes been a leader on this, along with Prime Minister may. He laid out his vision on how to defeat these terrorist organizations when he visited riyadh earlier in the year. With over 50 muslim ma sxwrort nations in attendance. He said we have to do three fundamental things. Deny them safe havens and support bases. Isis or al qaeda in their so called caliphates. In the greater middle east. The sec thing we have to do is cut off their financing. Finances they depend on to be able to organize attacks, plan attacks. Bankroll a lot of the extremist organizations that propagate this hatred and intolerance and advocate for violence. And this third thing is related to that. Which is to defeat their evil ideology. And, Prime Minister may has been a real leader in this in connection with understanding better how these terrorists use the internet and then block their ability to use that kind of communication to reach Vulnerable People to essentially pull them into these brainwashing organizations that fill them with hatred. And direct them toward violence against innocent people. The president talked about a larger, tougher travel ban. Is that something youre going to propose . If you cant screen people effectively, to know who is coming into your country, then you shouldnt allow people from that country to travel. So what the travel been is is a first step, a first step in better screening. Better sharing of information. To encourage governments to meet the requirements that we have to so that it allows us to protect our own people. Will we see a new one . Well, this is something that were looking at is how to protect the American People better. How to ensure that we know who these people are, who are moving. Because the strength of these terrorist organizations. Why this is a greater danger than ever is first of all their ability to communicate. To connect what would otherwise be disconnected cells in other places of the world. The second part of this is their ability to travel. And to move and to move people and money and weapons often times drugs and other elicit goods internationally. Part of the strategy must be to interdict these networks. Interdict them from how they use information and communicate. And how they move physically. The president is coming to the u. N. To giver his first speech to the u. N. General assembly. Heres what he said about the u. N. In the campaign. The United Nations is not a friend of democracy. Its not a friend to freedom. Its not a friend even to the United States of america where, as you know, it has its home. Will that be part of the president s message to the u. N. On tuesday . It will be part of his message that the United Nations needs to reform. And the United Nations has to reform to meet the goals and objectives laid out by the great secretarygeneral there. And, to be true to its charter. You know, any International Organization has a broad range of perspectives within it. And what we have seen in recent years is that certain nations are undermining key committees. Key organizations. The president will say the u. N. Is not a friend to america . In way that cuts against our interests. The president will say the u. N. Is not a friend to america . Well, parts of the u. N. Have not been. Look at the Human Rights Council that is populated by countries whose actions against their own people are particularly heinous . And so whats important is to focus on reform. The secretarygeneral has laid out a strong road map. Ambassador ha lerks haley is supporting the secretarygeneral with a luncheon for the people signed up for the reform program. The president is going to say the United Nations cant be effective unless it reforms and achieves a higher degree of accountability for Member States. Some Member States are trying to infiltrate and subvert key units within the u. N. For example, the telecommunications efforts within the u. N. Are being subverted by a country that actually wants to dominate that field and wants to restrict the flow of information. Stunning headline in the wall street journal right now. I want to put in on the screen. The Trump Administration seeks to avoid withdrawal from the paris climate accord. Article says Trump Administration officials said saturday the u. S. Would not pull out of the paris agreement, offering to reengage. In the International Deal to fight Climate Change. According to multiple officials at a Global Warming summit. Is it indeed possible that the United States might not withdraw . So what the president has said is that were withdrawing from the paris accord. He left the door open to reentering if there can be a better deal for the United States. The president s objection to paris was not the objection to the environment or the climate. In fact, he made a pledge, if you go back to his speech, he said were renewing our commitment to have the cleanest air, cleanest water. But that that agreement was not good for the environment. It gave the biggest polluters, the biggest carbon emitters a free ride. And so, we also want to emphasize, real energy, energy security, and then also, clean fossil fuels. Clean fossil fuels can continue to lift millions out of poverty around the world. So what the president wants is a more effective approach to energy and the climate. Right. The but was very clear in the statement. He said the United States will withdraw. That withdrawal cant take place before 2020. If you can renegotiate better terms before 2020, the United States will not withdraw . I would just go back to what the president said. Hes open to any discussions that will help us improve the environment. Ensure energy security. And advance our prosperity and the prosperity of American Workers and business. Its possible that the United States would stay in if you can get a new agreement. If theres an agreement that benefits the American People, certainly. Lets talk north korea. The president tweeting about that overnight as well. He said he spoke with president moon of south korea last night and asked him how rocket man is doing. Long gas lines forming in north korea. Too bad. I assume rocket man is kim jongun . Well, it appears to be so. Thats where the rockets and missiles are coming from. Is north korea. What does the president mean that the sanctions passed this week were not a big deal . Nothing compared to what ultimately will have to happen. What ultimately has to happen . We all have doubts about whether or not that is going to be enough. We have to prepare all options. Make sure all options are under development to ensure that this regime cannot threaten the world with a Nuclear Weapon. So thats what were endeavoring to do is maximize pressure through sanctions. Recognizing this is a very significant but not a decisive step. The sanctions have just now been put in place, as well. The critical thing is going to be to get all countries, everyone to do all they can, to enforce those sanctions. Do everything they can short of a military conflict, to resolve this problem. Do you see any evidence at all, general, any evidence, that kim jongun is ever going to give up his Nuclear Weapons . Well, hes going to have to give up his Nuclear Weapons. Because the president has said he is not going to tolerate this regime threatening the United States and our citizens with a Nuclear Weapon. Youre saying the president will strike if he doesnt give up the Nuclear Weapons . Hes been very clear. All options are on the table. On the iran nuclear agreement, the president promised to rip that up during the campaign. Hes been under great pressure from our allies from theresa may, the president of france, the u. N. Secretarygeneral, not to abandon that nuclear deal with iran. What is going to happen . As the president said, it is the worst deal ever. It was not good for the world based on really what it gave the iranians. All the benefits up front. The Enforcement Mechanisms have been executed in a weak way. It will be very important to verify that iran is not continuing to do what they had been doing already. They are come plying with the agreement, arent they . Too much heavy water. Enforcing really going to be critical. We have to make sure that no deal with provide cover for the Iranian Regime to develop a Nuclear Weapon in a clandestine matter while theyre reaping the benefits of this deal. Meanwhile, look at what iran is doing in the region. Theyre engaged in a broad range of destabilizing behavior that has created and is perpetuating a humanitarian and political catastrophe in the middle east. With isis and al nusra in way that is keeping this arab world perpetually weak. And enmeshed in conflict. Theyre using terrorist groups and militia proxies. To advance their interests and threaten their neighbors. This is the kind of behavior that has to be confronted around the deal and where its appropriate within the deal. If we could get that deal with north korea, we would take it, wouldnt we . I dont think so. I think we recognize significant pitfalls in this deal. What the problem is in north korea has been for years, as you know, we negotiated with them before. North korea has then entered into these weak agreements and then immediately breaks the agreements. The agreements in the past have done for north korea is locked in the status quo as the new normal. Allowed them to continue to develop more programs. Thats why we are now where we are now with north korea. We need a different approach with north korea. We may have the opportunity to engage in talks. They better be under fundamentally different conditions than we have begun those talks in the past. General mcmaster. Thank you for your time this morning. Thank you, george. More now from the ranking democrat on the house committee, congressman adam schiff. Thank you for joining us this morning. Lets start with north korea. The general saying north korea has to get rid of their weapons or face a strike. Your response . My response is i think were doing what we need to do, which is tightening the economic noose around north korea. Were going to need to make sure china fully complies. When we lose our focus, china goes back to business as usual. With each provocation from the north, we have to up the pressure and force them to the table. I think that is the only way of resolving this. Right now, the United Nations, we need to make sure that those that have agreed to the sanctions live up to them. And underscore were willing to sit at the table, resolve this diplomatically. We need everyone working together on this. We cant have the president of the United States calling our allies appeasers. We cant have him acting, frankly, in conflict with his own secretary of state. Secretary of defense. This is going to be hard to accomplish. We need to be pulling in the same direction. Right now, too often general mcmaster is talking about a president not that we have but one that he wishes we had. Instead, we have a president taking steps through his p pronouncements and tweets that can be very counterproductive. It seems that President Trump may be finding a way to stay in the paris Climate Change agreement. Well, i think that would be wonderful. Its very difficult to tell day to day what the administration intends with climate, with the dreamers, and any host of other issues. But look. We should invite the administration. Encourage the administration to reconsider. I think it was probably the s