Page 15 - 1507 News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Of the supreme court. i think that is inappropriate that is an acceptable compromise. more than anything i think the house needs a take it up and pass it early next week. and i am optimistic after several conversation with house leadership that they will. rankly as you also reference in the introduction, bret, the january 6 hearing that just took place was a riveting reminder of the dangers of politically motivated violence in our country and the gun massacres -- the shootings that happened at a grocery store in buffalo and at an elementary school in uvalde are also a call to action. i am grat...

Possible. i think that is fundamentally wrong. >> do you think these protesters should be prosecuted for breaking federal law? >> what is the federal law, i'm sorry? >> u.s. code 1507, prevents picketing operating in a building housing the court or in a building or residence occupied or used by such judge. do you think they should be prosecuted for breaking federal law? >> the supreme court itself has heard this argument, and they have themselves said it is protected by the first amendment. >> tucker: kind of weird, they are defending all this on the eve of the january 6th protest hearing. jus...

Andy mccarthy, fox news contributor, former assistant u.s. attorney for the southern district of new york. so andy, i want to lean hard on this. yes, there is movement, they want the house to do something. something on capitol hill. but we have 18 u.s. code 1503 and 1507 that are meant to protect all judges and jurors. why is this administration not leaning in and using the laws that are already on the book without the excuse of well, we just can't come together on capitol hill? they don't come together on everything. we already have law. >> we do have law. they aren't enforcing it and they ar...

>> harris: you heard mitch mcconnell, talking about seeing this coming, this is why he says that, there are laws protecting supreme court justices, we have talked, since 1503, and 1507, start with those three, influencing or injuring a juror, any judge, any juror. it is plain as day. you cannot intimidate them come you cannot threaten them. you cannot and them coming you cannot endeavor to influence them. this man making death threats. >> kayleigh: it is appalling, you read the language. to my knowledge there was not a correspondent that read that to jen psaki, they should have, because here i...

Lose your freedom of choice. he can't the house so easily, so maybe that's a good lesson for him. >> their argument seems so delusional to me because as you just pointed out while we were watching that, they are breaking the law by showing up. they are breaking the law by picketing. yes, they have security. a lot of people have security. but that's not the point. think how they have security because that's not the point. you can't go there, you can't intimidate, you can't show up to their house. i don't think that the people we heard from our reading u.s. code with team zero three or 1507. >> ...