Live Breaking News & Updates on U s code

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from U s code on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in U s code and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Velshi

particularly in the south, the ku klux klan expanded quickly and so did their violent backlash against new black voters. in order to prevent black people from even getting close to the polls the kkk launched intense, violent, intimidation campaigns, and that intimidation eventually escalated to murder. hundreds of black men of voting age across the south were killed by the kkk in the lead up to the presidential election of 1868, some historians put that number at closer to 2000. by 1870, congress took action, establishing what were known as the kkk acts, or the enforcement acts. they were designed to protect civil rights, empowering the government to protect newly enfranchise black people to vote, to hold office, to serve on juries and to receive equal protection under the law. decades later, the law originally adopted as part of the first kkk act of 1870 was amended to become section 2:41 of title 18 of the u.s. code,

People , Order , Voters , Polls , South , Ku-klux-klan , Backlash , Intimidation-campaigns , Violent , Election , Men , Number

All In With Chris Hayes

fourth charge against the ex president, conspiracy against rights. quote, defending donald j trump len and find, conspire, confederate, and agree with coconspirators known and unknown to the grand jury to injure the, press threaten and intimidate more persons in the free exercise and enjoyment of a right and privilege secured to them by the constitution and laws of the united states. that is the right to vote and to have one's vote count. donald trump is the first president to be charged with section 2:41 of the 18 u.s. code. he's far from the first person charged with it. the section number probably doesn't mean much to anyone, but it is from the first series of reconstruction era acts, known as the ku klux klan acts. it's one of the first charges brought under this law, over 100 years ago against two elections board officials in blaine county, oklahoma. the men were part of a three person board, and during the 1912 election, they engaged a conspiracy that, quote left out

Conspiracy-to-defraud , President , On-trump , Coconspirators , Rights , Ex , Quote , Charge , Find , Grand-jury , Confederate , Len

All In With Chris Hayes

trump. prosecutor jack smith ends the document with the charge against the ex president. conspiracy against rights. quote, defendant donald j trump did knowingly combine, conspired, confederate and agree with coconspirators known or unknown to the grand jury to injure, oppress, threaten and intimidate one or more persons in the free exercise and enjoyment of a right and privilege secured to them by the constitution and laws of the united states. that is the right to vote and have one's vote counted. donald trump is the first president to be charged with section 2:41. of the u.s. code, far from the first person charged with it. the second probably when mean much to anyone. what is the first series of reconstruction era acts known as the ku klux klan acts. it's one of the first charges brought under this law, over 100 years ago against two elections board officials in blaine county, oklahoma. the men were part of a three person board, and during the 1912 election, they engaged a conspiracy that, quote left out of their official canvas all of the votes from 11 precincts

Donald-trump , President , Jack-smith , Conspiracy-to-defraud , Coconspirators , Ex , Rights , Quote , Defendant-donald-j , Charge , Document , Grand-jury

FOX and Friends

thereof or by force to prevent, hinder or delay the execution any law of the united states or by force to seize, take or possess any property of the united states, contrary to the authority thereof they shall fined under this title or prison of 20 years or both. mr. prosecutor, i notice this isn't in your bill of particulars, why is that? why is it that the media is not saying? he wasn't charged with a slam dunk charge, why? because he didn't commit that act. remember this one? 18 u.s. code section 2383. rebellion or insurrection, isn't january 6th insurrection day? whoever incites, sets on foot, assists or engage in any rebellion or insurrection, laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort there to shall be fined in prison of ten years or both, in

Law , Trust-america , Force , Property , Execution , Steve , Media , Prosecutor , Prison , Authority , Both , He-wasn-t

The Story With Martha MacCallum

the minute that -- i cooperated with them. the mitigating factor is that i cooperated with the government. when dennis toner and i spoke and he said he didn't know what i was talking about, the next day that unsealed the indictment, wouldn't let me talk to the bidens and would not -- now it certainly makes sense what i was suspecting back then. certainly makes sense now. >> martha: what do you mean by that? >> well, they were protecting the bidens then, they're protecting them now and i think the evidence is overwhelming that when attorney general merrick garland said that he treats like cases alike, that's really what upset me. i can tell you no, sir, you do not. you do not treat like cases alike. that's why i filed my intent to file a brief called an amicus brief to help the court understand because she's required under statute 18 u.s. code section 355-3 a-6, she's

Government , Dennis-toner , Mitigating-factor , Martha , Indictment , Sense , Bidens , Wouldn-t , Evidence , Sir , Cases , Merrick-garland

All In With Chris Hayes

lawyers. that would be who he's trying to build a case on. some of these people who were involved in this game, you saw that email a moment go very problematic. jenna alice, others were involved in that fake electors scheme. they would be the next targets. so while he's working on a bottom-up scheme, we know that he's working from the top down as well with pence. but this, i think, is a an important development. in terms of the concrete evidence here >> again, i'm not a lawyer. it does seem if you sign the document, that is fraudulent, and that attempt to use it to get someone elected president, and submitted to the national archives, you are engaged in fraud. so if you conspire with people to have them do that the u.s. code has a conspiracy to defraud the u.s.. if two or more persons conspire, either to commit the offense against the u.s. or defraud the u.s. or any agency thereof in any matter for any purpose, that does seem like a pretty

People , Electors , Scheme , Case , Lawyers , Email , Game , Some , Others , Targets , Jenna-alice , Evidence

Deadline White House

there are two parts of this, right? jack smith spoke briefly, but he did talk about not just his desire for a speedy trial but the defendant's right to a speedy trial. on the other hand, what glenn is reporting on and has reported on, is trump fairly successfully using legal delays to his benefit. tell me where the rubber meet. s the road there. >> well, the scheduling order that the -- that became public this morning that the judge had signed is a pretty standard scheduling order, because by vir chow of the speedy trial act, which is part of our u.s. code, separate from the speedy trial that's in the constitution, the code says, you know, in the ordinary case you'll be tried within 70 days of your indictment, right. so the judge was kind of looking at the calendar and picking the date that would get within that. there are all kinds of exceptions to that speedy trial act, where the judge can grant exceptions or continuances. the judge in her order

Written-questionnaires-before-trial , Reporting , Defendant , Glenn-thrush , Jack-smith , Talk , Hand , Parts , This , Briefly , Desire , Two

The Last Word With Lawrence ODonnell

it's not just should. it's must. 28 u.s. code section 485 says that a federal judge must recuse him or herself in any case where that judges impartiality might reasonably be questioned. no person could look at the situation and fail at least to say that that standard is met. and if she doesn't recuse herself, then the 11th circuit, threw a writ of mandate muss and director to do so, which is very rare. if this is indeed a very rare case. it's a remarkable thing is that donald trump's lawyers argued that judge merchan, who is set to conduct the trial we, brought, pursuant to the alvin bragg indictment in manhattan, that he is someone that must recuse himself.

January-6th-case , Appointed-wilkie-ferguson , U-s-code , 28 , 485 , Person , 11th-circuit , Impartiality , Standard , Situation , Writ-of-mandate-muss , 11

Deadline White House

no? >> yeah, she does. and i don't think questioning her competence or her experience is really a winning argument for anybody. i think it's interesting, i think it's relevant to kind of assessing how she handles these issues. but it's certainly not qualifying or disqualifying. i think the more important question is will she sort of strictly apply the federal law that talks about when a judge must disqualify themselves. 28 u.s. code 455. you know, it's actually a very low bar because it says that a judge shall mandatory disqualify himself or herself, in any proceeding, in which their impartiality might reasonably be questioned. importantly, that is an objective standard. it's not that there has to be proof that she cannot be impartial. it is that if her impartiality can reasonably be questioned. and i contend it can. and based on some of what charlie was just discussing

Argument , Experience , Issues , Anybody , Questioning , Competence , Aileen-cannon , Law , Question , Disqualifying , U-s-code , 455

Hannity

the 18 u.s. code as relates to entering the country that you've got to do so legally. by characterizing the state as sanctuary, are you thereby violating federal law, the laws that are on the books and that our own constitution states very unequivocally that in fact you should be follow something. >> the sanctuary policies have been on the books for decades. republican-led cities in the past, democratic state, more modern conception around dealing with reality. the cards that are dealt. you want people that are victims of crime to come forward and report those crimes. that's the purpose of sanctuary. you want a kid to be educated that is hear to -- you want that kid educated, take care of someone that is an emergency and not have them concerned that they'll be deported by a foreclosures. the point is you deal with reality. look, i stipulated, i'm happy to get rid of those protections by

America-in-california , Country , Laws , Law , Sanctuary , U-s-code , 18 , Fact , Something , Policies , Books , Cities