Page 17 - 1507 News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Of section 1507. they are shutting down private residence. they're shutting down private roadways and trying to intimidate supreme court justices. the supreme court could step. in that's why the governor, larry who he dan and then also you will be seeing a letter today of close to two dozen state attorneys general who have said listen, do your jobs, protect these judges. stop this intimidation of these supreme court justices. >> carley: listen to this quickly because a bullet recently flew through the window of your office building this happened on monday night. no indication nobody was target...

But i guess they ate and opened law break it all the time at the border. pro-abortion group is planning to hold more protests at justices' private homes and this is not only wrong, it is unlawful as i have been saying. look at the puppet section 1507, title xviii u.s. code it is illegal to protest near a kristin's occupied or used by a judge juror witness or court officer with the attempt of influencing the discharge of his duty and get this. one of the reasons it is illegal to protest outside the private homes of public officials is because of a case that actually protected the privacy of an ...

The voting rights act, then par for the course. >> i'm just going to jump in. apology, we're out of time but i have to ask one last question, briefly what is your reaction to protests outside of supreme court justices homes in recent days? do you support them? in the washington post, they point to section 1507 of title 18 of the u.s. code which he says clearly states it is illegal to protest near the residence of a judge. do you agree with that, is it illegal to protest in the way they're doing? >> the law either is there and it applies in which case the department of justice should enforce it...

President, the white house should take the responsibility of addressing this. >> three fair points, leslie, including from hispanic federal judge. >> so many points here. howie, january 6th. that's all i will say to people angry and protesting. used to live in san francisco, pacific heights, nancy pelosi house in plain view. you can google it people protesting there morning, noon and night. >> i'm not saying it hasn't happened before. but that doesn't justify it happening now. >> no, i don't feel violating the law, the constitution is very clear and there are exceptions for time, manner and pl...

Psaki, the white house spokeswoman used to work for demand justice on the front edge of advocating against the court, but this should not be a partisan issue. this should be clear to everyone, there are strong feelings on both sides of this issue. and the first amendme sphere where the people are not feeling threatened personally, and some have small children at home, including justice kavanaugh, whose house was picketed and protested. >> john: 18 u.s. code 1507 offers some protection to the justices in deliberation and decision making process, it says whoever with the intent of interfering wi...