Page 35 - 1898 News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Shannon: the president today, that he decided to share during this interview and renewed the debate over whether birthright citizenship is direct contact and understanding the 14th amendment how this has been interpreted for 100 years in this country but renewing this debate and there's an interesting piece in the washington post trump's proposal to end birthright citizenship is unconstitutional. george conway right together such a move would be unconstitutional but would certainly be challenged and the challenges would undoubtedly win. a lot of folks say the supreme court has not ruled direct...

Is with us as well. let me read the 14th amendment to the constitution. all persons born or naturalized in the united states and subject to the jurisdiction there of are citizens of the united states and of the state where in they resi reside. can the president sign an executive order saying that what has been the rule of the land for so many years, he is going to change it? >> the short answer according to most legal scholars is no. the president cannot unilaterally issue an executive order and overrule what is in the constitution. the 14th amendment having been in place since 1868. we are ta...

And, again, we have foreign students that are looking to on board into the workforce and competing against them. we're distracting the most vulnerable and scores of people watching this, clients coming to immigration lawyers throughout the nation are living in fear every time something like this happens. do not fear, this won't here's the argument that mike pence made today in support of president trump. >> we cherish the language of the 14th amendment. but the supreme court of the united states has never ruled on whether or not the languae of the 14th amendment subject to the jurisdiction t...

Look, do i feel it meets muster? absolutely not. this is again a political ping-pong that's going to be bandied about. an executive order, jake, cannot be put forward unless the constitution at authority is vested in the president here in article 1, section 8, it's with congress. did congress ever cede authority? absolutely not. supreme court held a hallmark case in 1898 after the 14th amendment had been ratified 30 years before that, again, those hallmark amendments 13, 14 and 15 dealing with the dred scott and the evolution of the reconstruction area, amendment 14 itself stating specifically...

Nation. yes, you put out a tweet. but you don't keep hammering home how anti-semitism is wrong or demonizing people of color is being wrong. where the president is going is wrong. and further, it's legally wrong. his own appointment to the fifth -- i believe it was the ninth circuit court of appeals, wrote in "the wall street journal" that birth right citizenship is enshrined in the constitution. and there's case law that the supreme court has decided on. the person in 1898, where the supreme court reaffirmed it. so i don't know what lawyers donald trump is talking to but the one he's appointi...