Vimarsana
Biggest News Aggregation in the World

Allied Fitting News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Stay updated with breaking news from Allied Fitting. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Top News In Allied Fitting Today - Breaking & Trending Today

Gray Reed Secures Jury Verdict Against Allied Fitting for Supplying Non-Conforming Pipe - Vimarsana News

Gray Reed Secures Jury Verdict Against Allied Fitting for Supplying Non-Conforming Pipe

/PRNewswire/ -- On April 13, 2022, a Harris County jury awarded nearly $200,000.00 in damages to Gray Reed's client, 3-J Ryan, Inc. (3-J Ryan), from the...

Texas Federal District Court Kicks Steel Importer's $6M Malpractice Suit Due to Lack of Personal Jurisdiction | Hinshaw & Culbertson - Lawyers for the Profession® - Vimarsana News

Texas Federal District Court Kicks Steel Importer's $6M Malpractice Suit Due to Lack of Personal Jurisdiction | Hinshaw & Culbertson - Lawyers for the Profession®

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: Allied Fitting LP v. Steptoe & Johnson LLP et al., No. 4:20-cv-03447 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 21, 2021) Brief Summary A Texas federal district court dismissed a legal malpractice action brought by an international steel importer against its former attorneys due to lack of personal jurisdiction. The steel importer had sought to recover $6 million in deposits made with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection that it was unable to get refunded due to a lapsed deadline. The court found dispositive that: (1) defendants did not perform any of the c...

Steptoe & Johnson Axes Steel Importer's $6M Malpractice Suit - Vimarsana News

Steptoe & Johnson Axes Steel Importer's $6M Malpractice Suit

ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT Steptoe & Johnson Axes Steel Importer's $6M Malpractice Suit Law360 (January 21, 2021, 10:11 PM EST) -- A Texas federal judge dismissed a steel importer's $6 million malpractice suit against Steptoe & Johnson LLP Thursday, finding that the case was brought in the wrong court since the firm didn't perform any terms of the contract in question within the Lone Star State. U.S. District Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt found that the Allied Fitting LP's suit should have been filed in Washington, D.C., where it had previously agreed to resolve any contractual dispute with the firm...

Source: law360.com