Page 20 - Amish Devgan News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Key Verdicts By Supreme Court In The Year 2020 In 2020, the top court faced a barrage of criticism over allegations of not acting swiftly towards the plight of lakhs of migrant workers. PTI 23 December 2020 outlookindia.com 2020-12-23T14:07:38+05:30 Wide-ranging directions passed in the “world war” against Covid-19 to alleviate the plight of citizens and keeping the wheels of judiciary turning by delivering several key verdicts, including the one which led to the hanging of four convicts in the sensational Nirbhaya gang rape and murder case, were the key imprints left ...

Sevanti Ninan   |     |   Published 21.12.20, 12:37 AM We had begun to believe that the Bharatiya Janata Party is striding ahead with its steady demolition of secularism and free speech because the courts are not resisting its agenda. But a closer look at what happened in the courts this year offers cause for cheer. This has been a significant year for media practitioners and citizens in the courts. While the cases involving the Republic TV anchor, Arnab Goswami, grabbed the headlines, ...

Posts against CM, Aaditya: Not a public figure, need not be arrested, says counsel for women A division bench of Justice S S Shinde and Justice M S Karnik was hearing Navi Mumbai resident Sunaina Holey’s plea that sought interim protection from arrest and quashing of all FIRs and charges levelled against her. December 15, 2020 12:09:09 am The Mumbai and Palghar police have filed three FIRs against Holey, after several persons, including Yuva Sena member Rohan Chavan, filed police complaints against her. The lawyer for Navi Mumbai resident Sunaina Holey (3...

Section 153A IPC -... Share This - Question of intent would be relevant for offences under Section 153A, 295A IPC. The Supreme Court interpreted the ingredients of the offence under Section 153A of the Indian Penal Code in the case Amish Devgan v Union of India.Interpreting Section 153A(b) of the Indian Penal Code, the Supreme Court has held that the term 'public tranquility' must be read in a restricted sense synonymous with public order and safety and not normal law and order issues that do not endanger... Your free access to Live Law has expired To read the article, get a premium account...