Page 6 - Ann Mcfall News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

i mean, fewer people smoking means fewer people getting sick from smoking, fewer human tragedies associated with that, lower medical bills, it is a good thing. last night californians voted on whether or not to raise taxes on cigarettes in their state, even though california in practical terms is really anti-smoking, the tax on a pack of cigarettes is low compared to the rest of the country. it's less than 90 cents a pack in california, the national average is more like $1.50 a back. so this ballot initiative yesterday would up the cigarette tax in this very, very anti-smoking state....

california has such a low smoking rate p. i mean, fewer people smoking means fewer people getting sick from smoking, fewer human tragedies associated with that, lower medical bills, it is a good thing. last night californians voted on whether or not to raise taxes on cigarettes in their state, even though california in practical terms is really anti-smoking, the tax on a pack of cigarettes is low compared to the rest of the country. it's less than 90 cents a ba ss in california, the national average is more like $1.50 a back. so this ballot initiative yesterday would up the cigarette...

populous state in the nation, it's kind of a good thing for the whole country that california has such a low smoking rate. i mean, fewer people smoking means fewer people getting sick from smoking, fewer human tragedies associated with that, lower medical bills, it is a good thing. last night californians voted on whether or not to raise taxes on cigarettes in their state, even though california in practical terms is really anti-smoking, the tax on a pack of cigarettes is low compared to the rest of the country. it's less than 90 cents a pack in california, the national average is mo...

doesn't hate cancer, californians yesterday had the opportunity to vote on something that would hate cancer in a really useful way. you'd make it so that fewer people would get cancer in the first place, because fewer people would be smoking cigarettes if cigarettes were more expensive, and you could also help cure cancer by funding a lot of research into it. and also for the record, if you were a california voter who was voting on this thing yesterday, you probably don't smoke anyway, and neither does anybody you know, except sometimes when they're drunk, but we don't need to admit ...

so if you hate cancer, and who doesn't hate cancer, californians yesterday had the opportunity to vote on something that would hate cancer in a really useful way. you'd make it so that fewer people would get cancer in the first place, because fewer people would be smoking cigarettes if cigarettes were more expensive, and you could also help cure cancer by funding a lot of research into it. and also for the record, if you were a california voter who was voting on this thing yesterday, you probably don't smoke anyway, and neither does anybody you know, except sometimes when they're dru...