Appendix C News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

right now on "ana cabrera reports," the countdown to new hampshire, new signs that ron desantis is giving up on the granite state. does that open a new lane for nikki haley. plus, writer e. jean carroll back on the stand this morning, who's not in the courtroom? donald trump, absent today after dramatic clashes with the judge. also ahead, the doj set to release a long-awaited report on the tragedy at robb elementary. what more it could reveal about the botched police response. and later, new u.s. strikes against houthi rebels in yemen. have these strikes done anything to stop a...

The investigation. Is that right . Thats correct. And you have a citation . Page seven, volume two. Thank you. One of these witnesses was michael cohen, the president s personal lawyer, who ultimately pled guilty to Campaign Violations based on secret hush money payments to two women the president knew and also to lying to congress about the hope for a 1 billion trump tower deal. After the fbi searched cohens home, the president called him up personally, he said to check in, and told him to, quote, hang in there and stay strong. Is that right . Do you remember finding that . If its in the repo...

Correct. You found in your investigation july 27th, candidate trump called on russia to hack Hillary Clintons email for the first time they did about five hours later, correct . Thats correct. You found august 2 that mr. Manafort met with a person tied to russian intelligence, mr. Kilimnik, gave him internal Campaign Strategy where russia was intending to do a misinformation campaign. Im not certain of the tie. The fact of the meeting yes, that is accurate. Your investigation as i understand it also found that in late summer of 2016, the Trump Campaign in fact devised its strategy and messagin...

And is that why you didn't do the interview? >> no, there is a balance how much evidence you have to satisfy the last element against how much time are you willing to spend in the courts litigating the interview of the president. the reason we didn't do the interview because of the length of time it would take to resolve the issues attending to that. >> joining our discussion now is sean patrick maloney of new york. congressman, thank you for asking the question that i wanted to ask but it was such an obvious question and i was sure someone would ask it. do you feel it was answered? do you fee...

Evidence of the president's intent to obstruct justice is and is that why you didn't do the interview? >> no, there is a balance how much evidence you have to satisfy the last element against how much time are you willing to spend in the courts litigating the interview of the president. the reason we didn't do the interview because of the length of time it would take to resolve the issues attending to that. >> joining our discussion now is sean patrick maloney of new york. congressman, thank you for asking the question that i wanted to ask but it was such an obvious question and i was sure som...