Stay updated with breaking news from Application Publication. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
On the first of February, in Qualcomm Inc. v. Apple Inc., the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“the CAFC”) vacated and remanded the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board”)...
The Federal Circuit released its decision in Qualcomm v. Apple providing guidance on AAPA in IPR proceedings. In doing so, the Federal Circuit vacated two IPR decisions of the PTAB where the PTAB had found several claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,063,674 unpatentable.
There are times when law enforcement officers or military personnel need to subdue a person or group of people without using lethal force. They rely upon a variety of tools and tactics to achieve this goal. Some of those tools include items like riot shields, batons and tear gas. One less-than-lethal tool is the Thomas A. Swift Electric Rifle, or Taser. electronic control device ( ECD). The typical Taser device is a handheld gadget that fires a pair of pins tethered to the handset by electrical wires. The handset sends pulses of high voltage electricity to the pins. Anyone shot by a Taser w...
To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: On March 1st, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued its Order on the Preliminary Motions Lists submitted by Junior Party University of California/Berkeley, University of Vienna, and Emmanuelle Charpentier (collectively, "CVC") and Senior Party ToolGen Inc. in Interference No. 106,127. (Somewhat curiously, the Board did not issue an Order in Interference No. 106,126 between The Broad Institute, Harvard University, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (collectively, "Broad") and Se...
To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: Senior Party Toolgen and Junior Parties The Broad Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Harvard University (collectively, "Broad") in Interference No. 106,126 and University of California/Berkeley, the University of Vienna, and Emmanuelle Charpentier (collectively, "CVC") in Interference No. 106,127 each filed Lists of Proposed Motions that the Board considered today and responsive thereto will issue its rulings shortly ( see "The CRISPR Chronicles: Enter Toolgen"). The CVC list will be the subject of this post. CV...