Arent You Setting News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

It? is that the best response, or somehow being more receptive? >> strategically, the problem is a lot of democrats respond to these things with emotion and not strategy. and the emotion is to say, well, why aren't you doing more? why aren't you doing a bigger deal? why aren't you setting yourself on fire? the strategic response is to open a pathway and to say, this is the honorable thing to do. we hope other people follow him, and we hope other people recognize as senator romney did that donald trump is a man who has gone well beyond the law and the bounds of propriety and all the norms that ...

Rick wilson. but how do the democrats handle a statement like that which came from mitt romney today? from some of them, really, that's it? you're just appalled, senator romney? what are you going to do about it? is that the best response, or somehow being more receptive? >> strategically -- the problem is a lot of democrats respond to these things with emotion and not strategy. the emotion is why aren't you doing more, why aren't you setting yourself on fire? the strategic response is to open a pathway and to say this is the honorable thing to do. hope others follow him and recognize that don...

Meddle in all 50 states, they'd have to find a way to flip a lot of votes and persuade a lot of people, but as it stands, as you well know, it would have taken flipping about 70,000 votes. they could koconcentrate their power in five states and get a satisfactory effect, so having a national popular vote would add a measure of security by making everyone's vote count across the united states, so i think actually a national popular vote is in our security interests. >> and finally, aren't you setting up a scenario where instead of concentrating on a handful of states because of their electoral ...

Votes or around 3 million votes. and for them to meddle in the election under a national popular vote they would have to meddle in all 50 states, find a way to flip a lot of votes, find a way to persuade a lot of people. but as it stands, i think as you well know, it would have taken just flipping about 70,000 votes. they could concentrate their hacking power in as few as five states and get a satisfactory effect. so having a national popular vote would add a measure of security by making everyone's vote count across the united states. so i think that actually the national popular vote is in o...