Armed Populace News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

with a robust set of laws, we can significantly limit damage. why can't we do that with guns? -- on that point. and they always fall back on the same argument, the constitution doesn't guarantee you are right but it does guarantee your gun right. a well regulated militia being necessary to the free stay, the right to the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. the second amendment. argue that the second amendment makes america unique, exceptional, and they're right. apart from the uk, we don't have the second amendment there, it's a right that doesn't exist in canada or ...

The only thing different from 1933, at least in America, is the Second Amendment.

That right only extends to the home, and they both make it very difficult to purchase guns. america, of course, is different, not just because of the second amendment but how the courts have interpreted it. take the militia clause. historically -- states and only states could raise militaries comprise of their own armed populace. in 2008, a conservative lead, john roberts supreme court -- in, it -- that the second amendment confirmed, not a collective, but an individual right to bear arms. since then, republican led states have rushed to expand gun rights, stand-your-ground, open carrie, permi...