Page 11 - Article Iii News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

This is a perilous time for the country and the court because the rule of law is being...

$10,000, but $1 million. do you think in that case the chill on the conduct at issue here would be sufficient to allow a federal court review prior to the end of the state court process? >> no, your honor, because that wouldn't affect either the article iii or sovereign immunity problems in this case. undoubtedly, it would increase the chill, the same way that individual you are exercising to protect, it would arguably protect -- >> as i understand, the only way in which you get federal court review is, of course, for somebody to take action that violates the state law and then be sued under t...

Becomes aware of a noncompliant abortion and they suffer the sort of same extreme emotional harm, that would ground an article iii injury for purposes of texas law. that would be sufficient to satisfy the texas article iii-style screen, that addresses some of my friends on the other side's concerns about an unlimited set of lawsuits or that anyone could possibly bring an sb-8 action. congress passes laws all time that don't expressly require that individuals show, for example, their own personal injury or traceability or redressability, but nonetheless, this court says, those are fundamental r...

Appropriate defendants under well-established article iii inequitable principles. second, the petitioner has asked for an expansion of access to the federal courts that only congress and not this court may provide. petitioner's article iii inequitable problems, again, with what they really want, an injunction against sb-8, the law itself. they can't receive that, because federal courts don't issue injunctions against laws, but against officials enforcing laws. no texas executive official enforces sb-8 either, and so no texas executive official may be injoined. petitioners then turned to state ...

0 weeks. lindsey? >> gabe gutierrez, thank you. and in just seconds, we'll take you inside the supreme court to hear arguments in two challenges to the texas abortion law. i'm lindsey reiser in for stephanie ruhle. jose diaz-balart picks up the coverage right now. good morning. it's 10:00 a.m. eastern, 7:00 a.m. pacific. i'm jose diaz-balart. and we begin with something that hasn't happened before. for the first time ever, msnbc will bring you live oral arguments from the u.s. supreme court as it takes up two cases stemming from the controversial texas abortion law. this will be audio only...