Page 5 - Article Iv News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Strong solidarity with turkey and condemned terrorist attacks against that country. john huddy live in middle east burr rewith more on this. john? >> reporter: turkey requested the rare emergency meeting, by the way the fifth in nato's history under article iv of its treaty. article iv essentially allow as country to call for emergency meetings, consultations with other countries if that particular country feels its security is in danger. that is obviously the case here with turkey today. nato alliance members met in belgium to discuss the isis and recent terrorist attacks. secretary-general e...

Otherwise they would have acted. poland, right next to ukraine, called for article iv which a country can do when it feels its security is threatened. countries like poland, they're feeling this just based by their position on the map much more than the countries to the west of them. and that's driving a different reaction to this. >> what i heard today from both the president and the secretary of state is immense frustration about this referendum. and, you know, they're calling it illegitimate, unconstitutional. we heard nick burns call it farcical. my question that i have is are they doing w...

attorney general, an attorney day for your time, i'm sure you know the country and perhaps the world will be watching as you implement this law going forward. we start the 11:00 hour here on the east coast. several important decisions from the united states supreme court today. this headline, the big health care decision will not come until thursday, that will be the final day of this year's supreme court term, including the charge of the president's signature first term initiative, also called obama care. but a most important verdict in the arizona immigration case, several provisio...

Proceedings of every other state. now, david, you say that means they are not entitled to have a divorce. how do you figure? >> yes, well, because constitutionally the supreme court has held that applies to court rulings or court judgments and not legislative actions, such as creating a law pertaining to same sex marriage. now, mercedes brings up interesting points, the defense of marriage act, is signed by then president clinton, by the way, created two things. it allow that there is no federal law pertaining or supporting same sex marriage and allowed each state to create its own set of laws...

Implicit admission the right exists in texas when it doesn't? >> great question, greg. if you look at the full faith and credit the body of law that states this, it doesn't say somehow it preempts the law of the state, for instance if i have a judgment in vegas, 90% interest rates, i've come to new york to get it validated an execute upon it, the full faith and credit argument, new york has to recognize that judgment. but, suddenly the usury laws in new york are not preempted and it's not like i can start a judgment in new york and say just because it was validated, a vegas judgment validateva...