progress in my career. so science has been central to my career progress. and yes, i respect the science in everything i do. and i respect and trust numbers and figures. science has guided my life. this is a fact. and i have repeatedly said on many occasions and on many different platforms that it is the science that has guided the principles of our strategy is cop28 presidency. and i have been crystal clear about that and i hope that this time, i am clearer in getting this message across. the science says that we must get to net zero emissions by 2050 and we must reduce emissions by 43% by 2030 in orderfor us to be must reduce emissions by 43% by 2030 in order for us to be able to keep 1.5 within reach. and i have been very clear that myjob and this mission is to ensure that my norstar, north star is about keeping 1.5 within reach. and that will not change. that will not change. in fact, will not change. that will not change. infact, if will not change. that will not chan
take place. so they were allme debating, media was all debating about whether they would cover it or not. the associated pre said no, we don t want to offend anybody. bill kellerer, the executive editor of the new york times said we don t want to offend people. then fox news didn t cover it, said they wouldn t covert the burning at all. and back to a.p. again, before i forget is that they also forbade any pictures or videos an and they went so far to talk about no detailed descriptions of a burning. well, there is an element of overkill here. this was the subct of much comment. some in the media thought there was a double standard, though, going on here. that is to say that the fst amendment rights by the owner of the mosque proposal were very much iadn play. he had a right to his first amendment rights. but nobody wanted to report