Live Breaking News & Updates on Doesn t get

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Doesn t get on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Doesn t get and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Andrea Mitchell Reports

doesn't get dragged into a larger conflict. they need to come with long-range missiles to knock down the drones that the russians are launching, cruises myle -- missiles. artillery needs to come in. they just passed a law. they need to build for an offensive next year. that's important. the u.s. has more to do. this is just the leading edge. the $60 billion is just the leading edge. atacms, making sure ukraine has resources to take all of that massive equipment that was provided, that is broken down, just normal wear and tear, needs to be fixed. training the ukrainians to do all these complex things, defend against russia and then conduct

Drones , Missiles , Conflict , Russians , Doesn-t-get , Cruises-myle , Law , Artillery , Hit-us , Edge , 60-billion , 0-billion

The Last Word With Lawrence ODonnell

massive coverage during the day because fireworks get coverage. however, there wasn't a single relevant second in anything involving donald trump in the courtroom or what he said standing in front of a bunch of flags after he left the courthouse. there's actually no legal news whatsoever in what donald trump did today. >> that's right. even in the closing arguments in many ways there wasn't anything new. both sides have putting an extensive briefs and said this was sort of an oral version of that. i will say the one thing that i thought was knew from the perspective is the state in its brief had not really addressed all of the trump arguments, and so they took their time in the oral presentation to really refute one by one. so i thought it was very lawyerly and anything that doesn't get covered. they really went through with

Donald-trump , Courtroom , Coverage , Anything , Fireworks , There-wasn-t-a-single-relevant-second , Ways , Courthouse , Arguments , Front , News , Wasn-t-anything-new

The Last Word With Lawrence ODonnell

date in manhattan. >> so, lawrence, first of all let me read you react to all those descriptions in all of those cases. trump is the biggest litigation magnet, and for my profession lawyers this would be a great jobs program, having paid his lawyers, but unfortunately he doesn't. that's why he gets into some of the hot water he's in, including today in new york. i think it's still possible for march 4th or close to that to be the trial date in the january 6th federal prosecution brought by jack smith special counsel in front of judge chutkan. the reason that people think there is going to be the way is that trump has asserted the argument that he's absolutely immune from criminal laws, something that you are saying at the beginning of the show. that argument went over like a lead balloon earlier in the d.c. circuit, the nation's second highest court, just a couple of days ago. i expect that court is going to

Donald-trump , Cases , All , Lawrence , Litigation-magnet , Profession-lawyers , Descriptions , Jobs-program , In-manhattan , Lawyers , New-york-city , Some

The Last Word With Lawrence ODonnell

was not supposed to happen. and when asked if he's going to agree to the ground rules, to say that he couldn't abide by the ground rules adjusted it anyway. so it was unexpected, but as we have seen in the past, not expected is perfectly expected in terms of the kind of spectacle that greets these events. >> andrew, all of this got massive coverage during the day because fireworks get coverage. however, there wasn't a single relevant second in anything involving donald trump in the courtroom or what he said standing in front of a bunch of flags after he left the courthouse. there's actually no legal news whatsoever in what donald trump did today. >> that's right. even in the closing arguments in many ways there wasn't anything new. both sides have putting an extensive briefs and said this was sort of an oral version of that. i will say the one thing that i thought was knew from the perspective is the state in its brief had not really addressed all of the trump arguments, and so they took their time in the oral presentation to really refute one by one. so i thought it was very lawyerly and anything that doesn't get covered. they really went through with

Andrew-weissmann , All , Coverage , Ground-rules , Kind , Terms , Fireworks , Spectacle , He-couldn-t , Events , Colorado-supreme-court-decision-banning-donald-trump , Courtroom

The Last Word With Lawrence ODonnell

the year ahead for criminal defendant trump is neal katyal, former acting -- host of the and andrew weissmann is still with us. it seems like the first trial date object smith prosecution in washington is like you to be delayed since that is what, that's the case that the being appealed on the immunity argument. it may be that the most solid trial date we are looking at there is the march 25th trial date in manhattan. >> so, lawrence, first of all let me read you react to all those descriptions in all of those cases. trump is the biggest litigation magnet, and for my profession lawyers this would be a great jobs program, having paid his lawyers, but unfortunately he doesn't. that's why he gets into some of the hot water he's in, including today in new york. i think it's still possible for march 4th or close to that to be the trial date in the january 6th federal prosecution brought by jack smith special counsel in front of judge chutkan. the reason that people think there is going to be the way is that trump has asserted the argument that he's absolutely immune from criminal laws, something that you are saying at the beginning of the show. that argument went over like a lead balloon earlier in the d.

Andrew-weissmann , United-states , Case , Prosecution , Criminal-defendant-trump , Immunity-argument , Neal-katyal , Host , Acting , In-washington , Trial-date-object-smith , Colorado-supreme-court-decision-banning-donald-trump

The Lead With Jake Tapper

right now and the u.s. interest has been clearly stated by the nat a two-state solution that allows a state for palestinians and israelis is an option we would like to see for peace in the region, but netanyahu doesn't support that. in fact, part of the problem is we didn't have idf soldiers outside of gaza the day of the attack because they were protecting illegal settlements in the west bank. >> i'm not disagreeing with any of it. we're not going to solve the crisis today. i guess the point is i hear what you're saying, but going after hamas is easier said than done when they hide among the people of gaza. that's all i'm saying. >> i just think that's an easy talking point, but that's not the reality. israel as you and i both know has some of the most intelligent intelligence and military on the planet and yet these attacks have been so broad and they've taken out so many healthcare facilities, schools, everything and i do think it's important, jake, to say because this doesn't get said hamas is no friend of

U-s- , Israel , Part , State , Region , Palestinians , Fact , Interest , Problem , Soldiers , Peace , Two-state-solution

The Faulkner Focus

comparatively rare. what he is not talking about is menacing on the street. homeless people bothering people. the shoplifting. that stuff he doesn't address. that's more underground. >> harris: it doesn't get counted. >> he is not talking about that but what people see and feel in the cities. >> harris: you have told us those are also the crimes that slide into other crimes that are more violent. >> of course. >> harris: if you only count the initial crime. did you hear the way that one person who lives in compton described it. she said we can't live through the street takeover. it is a whole takeover of blocks of areas in l.a. i lived in l.a. in the 80s and i saw it when i thought it was the worst, that's kind of what it is looking like again. >> same thing in new york. the conditions i saw growing up in the 70s. we're going back to that and a tolerance for it. this has been institutionized.

Harris-faulkner , People , Doesn-t-address , Doesn-t-get , Shoplifting , The-street , Crimes , Crime , Cities , Course , Way , Slide

Andrea Mitchell Reports

implied new hampshire mattered more than iowa. >> you know iowa starts it. you know that you correct it. you know that you continue to go -- >> i think it's a slap in the face to iowans. >> if i didn't love iowa, i wouldn't keep coming. if we're going to have fun, i'm going to say something funny tomorrow about south carolina or new hampshire. >> she's phony. she's trying to be relatable but doesn't get iowa. >> let's bring in brendan buck, former advisor to boehner and ryan. let's talk nikki haley and ron desantis. what are they doing right now? could we see something change in the next 11 days? i know the polls say donald trump is the frontrunner.

Iowa , New-hampshire , Slap , Something , Iowans , Face , Fun , Doesn-t-get , South-carolina , Brendan-buck , Ryan , Donald-trump

The Last Word With Lawrence ODonnell

official duties as the chief of staff, even if a number of the other overt acts were within the scope. what does that mean? it means i would assume, because i don't know the precise answer, that, maybe, the entire case does get transferred to federal court. it certainly doesn't get dismissed. it gets tried in federal court, and based on the available evidence, it looks like a conviction is the likely result. >> amy lee copeland, it does seem mark meadows will want -- if this decision goes against him, he will want to appeal it. >> i think you are absolutely right about that, lawrence. give him some time, if nothing else, and if it's against him, he has every reason in the world to want to appeal it. whether or not it's an appealable order is a good guess. i would think that it's conclusively determining the issue, and it would affect his rights, and in that way it could go up in what's called an interlocutory or intermediate

Case , Answer , Scope , Duties , Acts , Chief-of-staff , Number , Evidence , Mark-meadows-will-want , Copeland , Federal-district-court , Amy-lee

The Last Word With Lawrence ODonnell

transferred to federal court. it certainly doesn't get dismissed. it gets tried in federal court, and based on the available evidence, it looks like a conviction is the likely result. >> amy lee copeland, it does seem mark meadows will want -- if this decision goes against him, he will want to appeal it. >> i think you are absolutely right about that, lawrence. give him some time, if nothing else, and if it's against him, he has every reason in the world to want to appeal it. whether or not it's an appealable order is a good guess. i would think that it's conclusively determining the issue, and it would affect his rights, and in that way it could go up in what's called an interlocutory or intermediate appeal. >> i'm really copeland, we need your georgia expertise to untangle what is going on in the speedy trial situation, which suddenly just became, maybe, not so speedy. district attorney willis saying, to the judge, wait a minute,

Evidence , Mark-meadows-will-want , Copeland , Federal-district-court , Amy-lee , Result , Conviction , Doesn-t-get , Decision , Lawrence , Reason , World