take place. so they were allme debating, media was all debating about whether they would cover it or not. the "associated pre" said no, we don't want to offend anybody. bill kellerer, the executive editor of the "new york times" said we don't want to offend people. then fox news didn't cover it, said they wouldn't covert the burning at all. and back to a.p. again, before i forget is that they also forbade any pictures or videos an and they went so far to talk about no detailed descriptions of a burning. well, there is an element of overkill here. this was the subct of much comment. some in the media thought there was a double standard, though, going on here. that is to say that the fst amendment rights by the owner of the mosque proposal were very much iadn play. he had a right to his first amendment rights. but nobody wanted to report