Within the past hour or so, he confirmed actually reports that weve heard before that the kremlin was engaged in an negotiation to possibly free Alexey Navalny in the days before he finally died in an arctic penal you know, colony, a death by the way, that Vladimir Putin described as a sad event. Take a listen for mr. Navalnys passed away. Some colleagues told you that they were not members of the administration some people said that there is an idea to change mr. Navalny for some people who are in prison in western countries, you can believe me or you can choose not to. The person who spoke to me. You have not finished his sentence. Yes. I said i agree but unfortunately, what happened happened, we would exchange him i said and you pay only on one condition that he doesnt come back from the go. Let them sit there. Thats all that happens. What can we do about it . Well they, have it paula. A pretty interesting description of the negotiations that went on, apparently behind the scenes to
targets of assassination. alexandria hoff with the latest of the nation s highest court. justice alto called the speculation infuriating saying it doesn t make any sense given intensely how the conservative justices have been targeted since then. the rare interview comes before one year mark when politico published draft opinion justice alto told the wall street journal, quote, those of us who were thought to be in majority, were really targets of assassination. the justice also revealed that he thinks the supreme court marshal did a good job of the investigation that followed the leak and agreed that there was not enough evidence to make a public accusation. he added this, i personally have a pretty good idea who is responsible but that s different from the level of proof that is needed to name somebody. alto feels that the motivation was clear. despite weeks of protestors by advocates including outside of homes of conservative justices in that time an armed man was charge
flaws. indeed there s none who is righteous, no not one as the good book teaches. then we went through a phase where we wanted someone we could relate to, someone likable, someone we wouldn t mind sharing a drink or a meal with. being fun or likable is not the same as being competent. we don t pick a neurosurgeon based on how fun he or she is at a cocktail party. we don t pick an accountant based on his or her sense of humor. we pick the person with the most talent and experience and character and ability, the person who would be the most competent at doing the job. now it seems our politics leans towards someone who captures our frustration, our angst, disappointment, anger, and fear, someone who can list the grievances, someone who provides a reflection of where we are, but not necessarily where we should be heading. do we really need someone to tell us where we are? wouldn t we be better served with someone telling us how to get where we want to go. as we reflect on the my
germany s chancellor saying they don t want to make such a bold move alone and calling on others including the u.s. to do the same. and this is the strategy we have, that we are strategically interlocked, together with our friends and partners, that we are never doing something just by ourselves but together with others, especially the united states. reporter: that german resistance straining the nato alliance when they have acted largely in unison for the past year of this war and frustrating ukrainian president volodymyr zelenskyy. translator: do not hesitate. there is no need to compare. if you say i will give tanks if someone else also give tanks or i am powerful in europe but i will help if someone else outside of europe also helps. it seems to me that this is not a very correct strategy. reporter: ukraine s defense ministry putting out a lighthearted video appeal. the american m-1 abrams tanks, u.s. officials say, is too heavy, too complicated, too hard to m
[bell] steve: i m just waking up the folks here at the villages. say hello to captain newt. now are you, captain? very good. steve: thank you very much. how great is that? okay. so, everybody knows that yesterday thank you very much, sir. i said somewhere in america i was going to be showing up and knocking on a total stranger s door to make them a breakfast from our brand new cookbook. [cheers] steve: look how many people love cookbooks. actually, they just love fox & friends. [cheers and applause] right? they love fox & friends. we were looking for a place that was safe, obviously. we were looking for a place that is friendly. hello, how are you? [cheers] steve: remember this guy right here, peter, we stopped by his house last time four years ago. this was also the man we named our son peter after. actually, the interesting thing is, ainsley and brian, i would say that about half of the people who i have spoken to so far have referred to me as peter doocy. h