Stay updated with breaking news from Battle in america. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Been charged. the prosecutors face a lot of challenges. criminal defense attorney arthur aidala weighs in next. the fight to home school their children heads to court today. this is about more than an education. it s a battle in america. stay tuned. [ tires screech ] [ beeping ] [ male announcer ] we don t just certify our pre-owned vehicles. we inspect, analyze and recondition each one, until it s nothing short of a genuine certified pre-owned. mercedes-benz for the next new owner. hurry in to your authorized mercedes-benz dealer for 1.99% financing during our certified pre-owned sales event through april 30th. pre-owned sales event try running four.ning a restaurant is hard, ....
Could become secretary of state. but at that point, that was not realistic. and we just should appreciate and remember the we should remember our history. it happened. i think that s right. but let me talk politics. sam, you cover politics. who will win a battle in america if there s a battle between those who have seen nostalgia as a political mandate? it s better way back then. before pat buchanan, early 50s, way back. against people who say this country s getting better. for women, black people, immigrants, documented or other. it s getting better for gay people because it s becoming a better, bigger society. who wins that argument? it s a complex question because each side can use nostalgia in their own way. for instance, civil rights, you could have one person say well, much of the achievements were part of the individual communities coming together and another one saying listen, if the courts hadn t have helped out, none of this would be ....
Creation in america. like a banking system extracting your entire country or trade agreements extracting your entire country or a tax code that is for sale to special interests. so hang on a second, boehner and the republicans are in favor of those things. then again, so, too, is our president. our question, is job training another band-aid myth to make it appear these washington fools are actually doing something, while in fact they continue to simply avoid the problems. think about it. the training programs are historically corrupt, full of pork and favors, ineffective. and ultimately have failed to produce even a fraction of the millions in long-term jobs needed and promised from infrastructure to energy to health care. now, do not misunderstood me. it is obvious there is a need and a clear value in training people for jobs. but if you do it all wrong, you simply are blowing more taxpayer ....
A troubled asset purchase program. all of this goes back to many, many banks. now it s especially in europe, but two, three years ago, it was in the u.s., borrowed too much, lent too much, had too much leverage, too little capital, and the causes of that problem essentially are still in place. we added some additional regulations, but we didn t undo the things that led to the collapse. which is no capital requirements, basically capitalism in the banking system without capital. so you can do whatever it s a gambling parlor? well, you know, we used to have on the investment bank side, we had something called the net capitalization rule in place, since 1975, that limited it to 12 to 1 on the traditional depository banks. there s been a series of decreases in the amount of capital required. this has been a long, slow grind ....
Only for the retirees and the employees. solely for the participants, not for the companies or shareholders or top executives. it s a benefit if you work there and provide labor, in principle. it s deferred compensation. you re being paid for your work later. yes. and that should be protected, but it isn t. so like i said, sounds like social security. but, jimmy, social security, i think people can but there s no one else seeing i guess when it comes to whether it s state governors using state pensions to be free spending to get re-elected or corporations that are doing what is being described to us here today, who is the gatekeeper in the current model in the government that theoretically would intervene? would this be the attorney general in a given state? eric holder? who s the cop here? from the federal level, it certainly would be the ag. certainly, state ags could go after companies that are headquarters in their states or ....