Page 3 - Big Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Eyebrows about what exactly they would lan to do here. now, maybe they would uphold the rights of gun owners to possess firearms after they have an order for domestic violence, or maybe they wouldn't want to go that far and say, actually, going to make sure federal law is restored. we'll see what they say here, but another big law when it comes to fundamental rights, when it comes to constitution, violence against women. it'll be a big case to watch next term. >> and jen psaki, this is another case guns and et cetera has been an issue on the right. >> it's also become a hot button issue on the...

Backgrounds and not discriminate and that here it was really important everybody in the case conceded expressive activity was at stake. what the court was finding today is that the first amendment means the state cannot control somebody to creating product that has a message that differs from their religious beliefs just as the court in the past that said school districts can't make children raise their hand to the flag. we wouldn't say an atheist has to force someone to convert to a religion they don't believe in. the court is saying here we're not going to allow colorado to force the wedding...

Website designers from preventing to have to do a content or provide a website that has anti-gay content as well. so that protects that, but when it comes to -- when it comes to protecting speech, we should. >> and you put out a statement yesterday saying that with or without affirmative action because that was, of course, the other big, big case, we're failing to prepare too many of our black and brown students for higher education. what do you think we can do to prevent higher education colleges and universities from becoming elite, white institutions? >> sure. this -- what's crazy to me in ...

The Dimopoulos Law Firm is suing the NFL after the league threatened action against the firm for a commercial featuring Raiders' Maxx Crosby.

U.S. Supreme Court earlier agreed to consider two cases addressing necessary state of mind to violate FCA. FCA prohibits defendants from knowingly submitting false claims. That scienter standard is broader than just actual knowledge.