What they ve done already. you could say that the infrastructure bill that they passed will help because it will improve ports and airports seaports. but it s going to take a long time for that to happen. reporter: it s going to take a very long time, that s exactly right. we ll have to see how this holiday season goes. this could ease some of those tensions or it could exacerbate some of those tensions. the bottom line point here is 2022, it gets even more difficult to pass legislation. that is what s underlying all of this. all right, sahil kapur, jake sherman, thank you both so much. we said it was a really busy day on the hill. and this morning, flags at all federal buildings are flying at half-staff to honor the extraordinary life of bob dole. the world war ii veteran, long-time senator and former presidential nominee who died yesterday at the age of 98. dole is a republican from an era that no longer exists, a man who saw the government as a useful tool to help those suffering at home and abroad. he grew up in kansas, and he
What, did not commit a crime. here to react, fox news contributor, judge ken starr and a member of the president s legal team. we can sit here and analyze every second of these hearings, that seems to me to be a bottom line point the mainstream media doesn t want to talk about. one of the star witnesses says i didn t see any crime. right. we again are so far removed from watergate, hear s john dean testifying dramatically, i m in the oval office and i am participating in a criminal conspiracy with the president of the united states. here we have a witness who does not have a connection to the president, she s serving as am a bass door but she has no communication to the president and knows of no crime. so it s really night and day. and jordan at the first hearing you had the two star witnesses who were asked by john ratcliffe whether there was any impeachable offense and they initially simply didn t answer
Policy issues. and there are other people who can criticize tulsi. and i don t think she necessarily we don t want the election stalled again. bottom line point. true point. we re going to have much more on this and much more on the impeachment inquiry making its way through the house and the week of explosive testimony that could change the game in washington. when foreign affairs and judiciary committee member and chair of the congressional black caucus karen bass, congresswoman karen bass joins us next. he s a frequent guest on this show and of course he used to host this show. now you can get more steve kornacki in his article ii inside impeachment podcast every monday, wednesday, and friday wherever you get your podcasts. [ tires screech ] mom, you ve got to get yourself a new car. the car s fine. [ car horn honks ] i wish i could save faster.
Was still september 12, 2001. single minded focus. and then thinking back to the independent counsel experience in august of 1998, so i proposed some ideas for congress to consider. the bottom line point. there were ideas for congress to consider, they were not my constitutional views. if a case came up that where someone was trying to say this is a constitutional principle, i would have a completely open mind on that because i ve never taken a position on the constitution on that question. i ve only put out proposals for you all to study, to think about the balance of a president fighting a war, leading a war, and a president subject to say ordinary civil lawsuits as in the clinton versus jones case. you are learning the filibuster. let me ask this question precisely. the supreme court has ruled
He was of single-minded focus every morning for the next seven years. president bush, it was still september of 2001. single-minded focus. thinking back to the independent counsel experience in august of 1998. let i proposed some ideas for congress to consider. the bottom line point, they were ideas for congress to consider. they were not my constitutional views. if a case came up where someone was trying to say, this is a constitutional principle, i would have a completely open mind on that. i ve never taken a position on the constitution on that question. i ve only put out proposals for you all to study, to think about the balance of a president fighting a war, leading a war, and a president subject to, say, ordinary civil lawsuits, as in the clinton versus jones case. let me ask you, you re becoming more good and learning a filibuster. let me ask this question