The ability to appropriate essentially hundreds of billions of dollars. well, i think. just take think a step back and and think about how absurd that is , that it s even an argument that the president can all by himself just appropriate. five hundred billion dollars or i mean, we ll take the conservateta estimate. four hundred billion dollars.ati i mean, that is a ridiculouss amount of money. but if you look at the heroes act and that s really the statute that the department of education is relying on , the president is relying on that was that was a bil l that was passed in 2003 in reaction to the iraq war. poin. we got to go back.n go we we to that point, you can t go back to iraq. and that s y g to spend four hundred billion dollars. i think tribe is wrong. i think you re right. we ll see. caleb, thanks. stay with us. so musty in here about a damp,
The damages are pretty clear . he is going toe be stuck with a tax bill that he didn t ask for for this cancela and that he doesn t want. that s going to put him inoing o worse position than if ifd. nothing happened. and to the extent that the white house just said, you know, we heard the clip, they said, well, nobody s goingi to get this if they don t want it, that s just not true.th ste the department of education still on their website today says that as many as eighton million people in the u.s. are going to get automatic cancelation, at least starting this week, potentially nowpo, calev larry tribe tweeted abouty the lawsuit saying t a big weakness of it is the strength the statutory ground, which by this plan stands both under the heroes act and undertion the health and education act. caleb went on to say thatsing o the lawsuit was a stretch. so, again, focusing those two acts, the president is supposedloy findingapprop
You referred to this estimates the relief plan will cost four hundred, 30 billion dollars.iesu other studiet s put the numbera few hundred billion dollars higher. laura my goodness. trac l: ohe, thank you. and we re going to be tuning in. i cannot wait on october 3rd.. congrats again. thank you. thank you very much.n all right. joining me now is the leadrk attorney on the case, caleb eichenberg of the pacifie c legl foundation. caleb, we ve been waiting for a lawsuit like this now, the response to your critics saying that your suit has no standing because you re not an aggrieved party. what are the damages to you?aget in the pacific legal foundation? well, the question is notwele what s the damages to me ortion the pacific legal foundation? it s it its to the people that are getting this student loan cancelation forced upon them. and for michael frank garrison, who happens to be one of my colleagues, i mean,