Page 41 - Case Project News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Of just chat about that. Its 100 feet higher than it is today, what is before you. By increasing the height of this project, it seems kind of inconsistent with the plan that will add office space to the detriment of residential and commercial occupants. Im rather curious what was wrong with the original proposal. I thought it was a very well apportioned building to a building that was right next to it on Mission Street. I thought that looked very, very well. Ive also been told this is a done deal by a lot of the people ive spoken to already. And id like to think that that is certainly not the ...

Difference of the height and the zone height limit with the mechanicals but i wanted to point out there is some discussion about this height being out of character with the overall skyline and we worked with the developer on the issue in the past and it is true that the original proposal was over 600 feet and we werent comfortable with that because we feel its important to maintain the urban design and stepping up to the heart of the skyline and thats what this height does and it steps up here and thousand feet at the Transit Center so again all of the heights are this height limit we believe ...

So, just to be clear, what youre saying is twoyear extension. And that twoyear mark, if think didnt make that twoyear mark, theyd have to come back to the Planning Commission . Correct. Correct. Within that interim period, theyd update the design, work with staff on the design and come back as an informational item. Are you asking specifically that it go to the commission or preservation staff . Preservation staff. Staff, yeah. I would, i would actually suggest that you make that a joint discussion. On the informational item . Maybe if i may, one possibility would be to ask that the Architectu...

Tunnel effect thing happen. So, im happy that we can kind of just chat about that. Its 100 feet higher than it is today, what is before you. By increasing the height of this project, it seems kind of inconsistent with the plan that will add office space to the detriment of residential and commercial occupants. Im rather curious what was wrong with the original proposal. I thought it was a very well apportioned building to a building that was right next to it on Mission Street. I thought that looked very, very well. Ive also been told this is a done deal by a lot of the people ive spoken to alr...

It is gorgeous. Anyone would want to be a neighbor of that building. I do find it peculiar, though, that all of the renderings on that site, including the animation, depict mission as though it has already been approved for the increase and over a hundred feet for a grand total of 455. I think i saw a picture that stated that the top of the buildings was 375 feet, and im not sure all the documentation i have from you states 350 feet on the approved project. Forgive me if im distorting that in some way. And i understand that the planning departments plan for our neighborhood contemplates mixed ...