Deconstructing Justice Thomas' Pro-Censorship Statement
Wed, Apr 14th 2021 10:48am — Eric Goldman Last week, we had a post about Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas' very weird statement in a concurrence on mooting an unrelated case, in which he seemed to attack free speech and Section 230. Law professor Eric Goldman has written up an incredibly thorough response to Thomas' statement that we thought the Techdirt community might appreciate, and so we're reposting in here. Last week, the Supreme Court vacated the Second Circuit’s Knight v. Trump ruling. The Second Circuit held that Trump violated the First Amendment when he blocked other Twitt...
Source: techdirt.com