Verdict: US Supreme Court does not hold Twitter, Google and Facebook liable for terrorism-related content
US Supreme Court, in its verdicts in two cases, held that Google and Twitter are not liable for terrorism-related content.
Stay updated with breaking news from Communication Decency Act. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
US Supreme Court, in its verdicts in two cases, held that Google and Twitter are not liable for terrorism-related content.
Supreme Court issued two decisions:the Gonzalez case, second THE Twitter v. Taamneh case . Both involved allegations under ATA that the social media defendants provided material support to ISIS terrorists,the Gonzalez case focused more on the availability of CDA 230 immunity
The issues posed by the amendment are a unique legal development. Indian courts have not yet substantively dealt with legal cases where online speech of private citizens is sought to be controlled by the government in this way.
I’ve done a ton of stories on stolen cars. It's the first time I’ve heard anyone mention the law that protects the social media companies.
The online environment is full of child abuse and exploitation for the sake of profit which demands an immediate solution