Page 2 - Communications Ethics News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

What kind of information could be in the file that if we asked the Controllers Office and the Ethics Commission to rereview for potentially nonprivileged documents what those could even entail. Because the breadth of this privilege appears so broad that it is hard to imagine what would not be covered in light of yours and the City Attorneys of San Franciscos description. Sure. And maybe, internal communications about we are going to meet to discuss this at such and such a time. I dont know if who is assigned to the investigation, if that necessarily would be confidential, or how many people ar...

Purposefully misinterpreted to protect the agencies in question but also the ethics staff. As far as you not having a conflict of interest, lets look at the Arts Commission when they got the report from the civil grand jury that listed what they had done, including spending 300,000 on things that they had no Legal Authority to do so. Charging fees, that they had no Legal Authority and fire the cultural director and replace the head of the commission. The bottom line is if you were a commission and you were in charge of a staff and a staff screws up it reflects on you. You cant sit there and sa...

I dont know if that will be disclog be too much. I certainly would think that the Controllers Office would want to explain why it is. Or should not be disclosed. Any other thoughts from the commissioners on this . In a theoretical file, not the one at issue, are matters such as the timing of meetings, or strictly procedural matters included in the correspondence files of an investigate oral matter. Generally strictly procedural, and for example, when you talk about a meeting time, that is embedded within the procedure process, for instance if i am going to meet with a complaintant and you docu...

San francisco, open government, now that this Ethics Committee is Holding Meetings on sfgtv in full view of the public it becomes more apparent how much of an enabler this body has been, it enables city bodies and personnel to evade their daoulties under the law and to hide that from public scrutiny. The whistle blower laws are not be used to protect the whistle blower but to protect the target. They are being used to hide the true facts of the investigation and to allow the city agency and employees to evade their actions. They hide the extent and the validity of the investigative process use...

Protected confidential. I am trying to understand what kind of information could be in the file that if we asked the Controllers Office and the Ethics Commission to rereview for potentially nonprivileged documents what those could even entail. Because the breadth of this privilege appears so broad that it is hard to imagine what would not be covered in light of yours and the City Attorneys of San Franciscos description. Sure. And maybe, internal communications about we are going to meet to discuss this at such and such a time. I dont know if who is assigned to the investigation, if that necess...