Live Breaking News & Updates on Complexity

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Complexity on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Complexity and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Outnumbered

backwards." he said i would not have expected tax year dollars are they g that have given us a poly that would have been enough. >> the thing about the ukraine aid package which is like a silent justification among d.c. is a lot of that money is not going to ukraine, because it's going to supply munitions to replenish what we have given. the ones that talk about it, they sound like that as a positive. if you don't want to fund ukraine, you should find us. they have already given it to ukraine. they have made us accessible in doing that. they did that very quietly. no one's going to make this a selling point. the democrats will do it because their constituents get mad that they are funding defense. democrats don't like to defend our country as you see at the border. republicans won't do it. it shows their own complexity. passing this bill, trying to rob

Americans , Thing , Tax , Ukraine , Aid-package , Poly , It , Lot , Money , Justification , Supply-munitions , Positive

Trump on Trial New York v. Donald Trump

this very courthouse when he went and pled guilty to perjury charges stemming from his testimony last year in the civil fraud trial. now, he is currently serving several months in jail at rikers here in new york. and allen weisselberg is somebody who previously served prison time as part of the tax scheme through the trump organization. but allen weisselberg has never testified against specifically donald trump. largely that is what has led him to spending time at rikers and what is notable about weisselberg is the fact that we do not expect him to come forward as a testament either in the defense of donald trump or at the behest of the prosecution because, number one, there were questions about what allen weisselberg would actually testify to, and specifically, this is in the district attorney's interests to not have him testify because michael cohen is alleging that allen weisselberg was the other

Civil-fraud-trial , Testimony , Allen-weisselberg , Charges , New-york , Jail , Donald-trump , Somebody , Part , Tax-scheme , Trump-organization , Prosecution

Trump on Trial New York v. Donald Trump

that can be brought up, that won't be brought up if he doesn't take the stand? >> no, that's exactly why we have the sandoval hearing, to make sure the defendant is properly informed to make that decision, to make the cost-benefit an analysis? >> the hearing was there to inform the former president that if he does choose to take the stand, there are certain issues that he could be questioned on, perhaps that he might not know that he would be questioned on because you might think they're not pertinent or have anything to do with this case. we sometimes call it other bad acts, evidence typically in evidence, that those types of things are not allowed to be asked. this is so the defendant can make an informed decision. typically, jose, you do not see defendants taking the stand. remember, the defense has zero burden in this case. we're talking a lot about the defendant's witness list. it could be zero. they could not even give an

The-stand , Defendant , Won-t , Decision , Up , Sandoval-hearing , President , Witness-for-the-prosecution , Issues , Cost-benefit , Analysis , Beyond-a-reasonable-doubt

Trump on Trial New York v. Donald Trump

insistence on so what on earth is a crime. what's a crime of which i just described. he says that these business records, violations, 34 counts are really just 34 pieces of paper. chuck, how necessary is it for a defense in this case or in any case to obfuscate things and to try and clarify those things that can best benefit your client? >> sure, jose, with the caveat, again, that the defense doesn't have to prove anything and the burden never shifts to the defense, trying to make the government's case seem more complex than the government made it is a tact. nothing wrong with it. the defense attorneys have one advantage here. they can say things in their opening statement and not actually have to prove it. at the end of the day, the government cannot at any point

Crime , Business-records , Counts , Pieces , Violations , Earth , Blanche-insistence , 34 , Beyond-a-reasonable-doubt , Complexity , Things , Chuck-rosenberg

Trump on Trial New York v. Donald Trump

he says is this is donald trump that you have seen for many, many years on tv and in other places. he is in some ways larger than life, but he is also here in this courtroom doing what any of us would do, defend himself. he kind of has to be there, doesn't he? >> he absolutely has to be there. the judge wouldn't let him waive his right to be there. if i'm the defense here, to teb die owe's point about what the prosecution will do, a common thing defense attorneys will do is get ahead of the unsavory characteristics of their defendant but te tell the jury, you don't have to like my client. he may have done unseemly things in the past. they even prepared jurors in voir dire asking questions about how do you feel about people that potentially cheat on their wives. would you be able to keep an open mind with respect to them. oftentimes you'll see defense attorneys say, look, my client's

Donald-trump , Things , Places , Ways , Life , Courtroom-doing , Many , Tv , Complexity , What-juan-merchan , U-s- , Doesn-t-he

Trump on Trial New York v. Donald Trump

everyone, please stay with us. coming up in our next hour, the defense is about to get their opportunity to make opening statements. >> we'll have much more on our special coverage after a short break. don't go anywhere. bladder leak underwear has one job. i just want to feel protected! especially for those sudden gush moments. always discreet protects like no other. with a rapid dry core that locks in your heaviest gush quickly for up to zero leaks. always discreet- the protection we deserve! with the freestyle libre 3 system know your glucose levels. no fingersticks needed. all with the world's smallest and thinnest sensor. manage your diabetes with more confidence and lower your a1c. try it for free at freestylelibre.us ah, these bills are crazy. she

Complexity , Opening-statements , U-s- , Coverage , Opportunity , Break , Everyone , Anywhere , Don-t-go , Job , Bladder-leak-underwear , One

Trump on Trial New York v. Donald Trump

Trump on Trial New York v. Donald Trump
vimarsana.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from vimarsana.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

Colleague , Ana-cabrera , Jose-diaz-balart , Eastern , Pacific , 00 , 8 , 11 , Prosecution , Donald-trump , Beyond-a-reasonable-doubt , Complexity

Trump on Trial New York v. Donald Trump

they're getting deep at the underpinnings of the second crime. remember, this is 34 originally misdemeanor counts of false kaigs case of business records, bumped up to a felony because the prosecution needs to prove not only did donald trump sign those checks or do the falsification with, one, an intent to defraud, but two a separate intent to, in this case it's conceal, a previous crime which is, we're calling it election interference. it's really campaign finance law violation. the prosecution has sought to elevate their language surrounding how they are describing this case. it's going to be the defense's job to pick that apart and break it down. the defense in one of those motions in limine made an argument not to use the phrase catch and kill. they didn't win. they thought it was too prejudicial. oftentimes i think it's misleading when we talk about a scheme to suppress negative information, a catch-and-kill

Prosecution , Donald-trump , Beyond-a-reasonable-doubt , Crime , Business-records , Counts , Felony , Underpinnings , Kaigs , 34 , One , Intent

Trump on Trial New York v. Donald Trump

>> in their own case because you want to blunt the edge. >> quickly, caroline, we've talked about how the defense doesn't have to give an opening statement. it sounds like, based on what our understanding is, there will be an opening statement in this case, but are there risks to giving an opening statement if you are the defense? are you showing your cards? >> not in this case. i expect here the theme we will see, the prosecution is always going to want to boil things down, make it really simple, as maya said, focus on that brass ring. psychology is everywhere in a trial. the defense, complexity, confusion always works for their advantage. i suspect they will say, listen to the evidence carefully. does all of this make sense to you? they're going to harp on the law, harp on the specific elements, say it doesn't add up. confused juries always works for the defense's aid. >> our special coverage on msnbc continues with a look at the

Beyond-a-reasonable-doubt , Opening-statement , Case , Defense-doesn-t , Caroline-pull-lisi , Edge , Understanding , Quickly , Prosecution , Complexity , Things , Theme

Trump on Trial New York v. Donald Trump

with this story, having had sex with donald trump in 2006, which the former president denies, how they paid her $130,000. they'll talk about koog and the catch and kill. and the defense, talking about how michael cohen and stormy daniels have an axe to grind and how donald trump paid his attorney, that's all he did. that's what we're looking to today, guys, as a very big day in this nation's history. >> yasmin, you did a great job laying everything out as far as looking ahead to the opening statements. stand by with us as we bring in our legal analysts. maya, what did you make of the list of the scope that the prosecution could hit with donald trump if he were to take the stand, everything from the civil fraud trial outcome to the e. jean carroll cases to the gag order viegss that have been found in the case of the civil fraud trial. does all of this sound fair game? what does that tell you about how when the judge is viewing this as well as the decision the

Donald-trump , Michael-cohen , Complexity , Stormy-daniels-story , President , Stormy-daniels , The-catch , Sex , Koog , 130000 , 30000 , 2006