Stay updated with breaking news from Consensus opinion. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
They lied with the world health organization, and you would think on a matter of public health they would be more honest with the world. john: all right, i mean you can expect china will live up to your expectations but probably get disappointed every time. so, in the absence of china saying oh, we are going to be transparent, what should the biden administration do about this? i mean, you ve now got two federal agencies, the department of energy and the fbi, saying likely this came out of the wuhan laboratory. it has killed 1.3 million americans, shouldn t biden be doing something about it? well, i think first we need to have a directive to come to some consensus. other agencies still are questioning that, and so i would make sure within the next few months that we try to get to a consensus opinion and ask for recommendations about what action needs to be taken to make sure these kind of leaks don t happen again and make sure that there are consequences if there ....
That was not the consensus opinion at the time. but kyiv today looks much the same. it s incredible how resilient the ukrainian people are. they re going to fight through this winter. they re going to continue fighting russia. and with our assistance they re going to win this war. when you met with the ukrainian officials in kyiv, what did they tell you this he need from the u.s. and from nato allies other than the patriot missile defense system? well, they made the point that their needs have changed over time. if you remember when the war kicked off they wanted stinger missiles because they were so concerned about russian fighter jets and bombers in the skies. we got them those and they were essential in the early part of the conflict. but then they wanted advanced artillery systems to start taking territory back from the russians. now they need patriot missile defense to protect against this onslaught against their energy infrastructure. but i suspect in the future they re going ....
Correct way to go. he says there was not enough talk about trade offs, for example, what would locking down society mean for the economy. and he talks about, he makes quite the accusation, actually, that the minutes from sage were edited to remove dissenting opinions. he has since been speaking to the bbc this afternoon on the radio, and he has clarified there that what he meant was that he was only provided with the consensus opinion from sage, so perhaps dissenting voices were not made available. he is also quite critical of what he calls a fear narrative that he believes the government employed at points, such as for example using pictures of people on ventilators when encouraging the public to follow the rules. he is not saying that there shouldn t have been lockdowns but he is saying that more discussion and willingness to engage with the trade offs means there could have been perhaps different or shorter lockdowns. there has been quite a bit of a reaction to rishi sunak s comment ....
Scientists advising the government, that group scientists advising the government, that grouu known scientists advising the government, that group known as scientists advising the government, that group known as sage, - scientists advising the government, i that group known as sage, ultimately came to that group known as sage, ultimately came to their that group known as sage, ultimately came to their conclusions. that group known as sage, ultimately came to their conclusions. he - that group known as sage, ultimately came to their conclusions. he said i came to their conclusions. he said there came to their conclusions. he said there was came to their conclusions. he said there was not came to their conclusions. he said there was not enough came to their conclusions. he said there was not enough discussion i there was not enough discussion about there was not enough discussion about the there was not enough discussion about the trade off there was not enough discussi ....
Once the litigation was complete. in my view upon the conclusion of litigation was when i began to plan for life after the administration. i told him that i did believe, yes, that once those legal processes were run, if fraud had not been established, unfortunately i believed that what had to be done was concede the outcome. a crush of evidence there shown by the january 6th select committee in their public hearing today of all of the people around donald trump. it s hard to find anyone who disagreed with the consensus opinion that he had lost and should concede. let s bring in luke broadwater, congressional reporter. he was inside today s hearing. tell my from your vantage point what jumped out at you today? reporter: i was pretty shocked at some of the text messages and communications they ....