Claims about Voice and Indigenous land rights are false
AAP FactCheck shares with Crikey its most recent finding concerning viral Voice to Parliament misinformation.
Stay updated with breaking news from Constitution Alteration. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
AAP FactCheck shares with Crikey its most recent finding concerning viral Voice to Parliament misinformation.
It is perfectly clear a law not submitted to voters cannot be approved by them and, therefore, cannot be presented to amend the Constitution. Here behold the Voice referendum question's sleight of hand: the short question Australians are being asked to endorse or reject is not -- repeat is not -- what would be added to the Constitution. Should 'Yes' succeed, it will prevail only until the High Court inevitably rules against it
Don’t fall for the propaganda that May 1967 was of great national rejoicing by a unified nation that had suddenly become progressive. Before polling day, I’ll write on the 1999 referendum that has been also mis-described and give some friendly advice to Anthony Albanese.
Like the Voice plan, the 1999 republican referendum was a big business-backed project to strengthen the anti-democratic Constitution while presenting a false progressive image for Australian capitalism.
In the ever-evolving landscape of Nigerian politics, the transition from one House of Representatives to the next often carries with it a delicate balance of