Stay updated with breaking news from Coordinate Bench. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
![[NDPS ] Is accused entitled to default bail if there is no chemical analysis report along with final report? Supreme Court asked to decide - Vimarsana News](https://gumlet.assettype.com/barandbench%2F2021-04%2F8534549e-5d70-45bd-b5b9-280f8302f5b3%2FSupreme_Court__NDPS_Act.jpg?w=1200&auto=format%2Ccompress&ogImage=true)
Is an accused is entitled to statutory bail under Section 167(2) CrPC when no chemical analysis report is filed along with the final report, within the 180 days period mandated under the NDPS Act?
17 hours ago Arguing that the Right to be Forgotten gives people control over their digital lives, the petition cited multiple cases filed before courts in India and abroad; even turning to the PDP Bill for legal precedent. An Indian reality television celebrity has approached the Delhi High Court with a petition invoking his Right to be Forgotten wherein he urged the court to direct relevant persons to remove posts, videos, and articles from nearly a decade ago that allegedly presented him in a bad light. The Delhi HC, while hearing the petition, issued a notice to Google LLC in this rega...
By Taxscan Team - On April 26, 2021 10:15 am The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Hyderabad Bench held that the exemption can not be disallowed under India-Austria Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) only for want of Tax Residency Certificate (TRC). The assessee, Ranjit Kumar Vuppu is a Non- resident individual, filed his return of income for the A.Y 2014-15 on 31.07.2014 admitting total income of Rs.10,04,580/-. During the assessment proceedings under section 143(2) of the Act pursuant to selection of his return of income for scrutiny under CASS, the assessee was required to fu...
Updated Jan 21, 2021 | 18:49 IST Four of the five judges on the SC bench – AM Khanwilkar, Ashok Bhushan, S Abdul Nazeer and BR Gavai – dismissed the petitions but DY Chandrachud provided a dissenting opinion that ran up to 16 pages. The Supreme Court of India. | Photo Credit: PTI Key Highlights It was only in 2016 when the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act was notified Since its notification, the case has recorded two landmark judgements – the first relating to citizens right to privacy observed i...