Page 35 - Corrupt Intent News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Things, prosecutors can prove that donald trump did these things. but we have always hear people questioning whether they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt, his corrupt intent. bill barr laid that to rest in the earliest moments of the hearing, when he said, i told donald trump his claims of election fraud were bull as. period. now, let's talk about what donald trump did. i was so heartened to see, does that the january 6th investigation, was proving donald trump's crimes with republican voices. bill barr, jason miller, eric short. the republican poster, alex cannon. and, i blanca, his own d...

Off, i maintain that there is enough evidence to hold donald trump accountable in a court of law for the crimes he committed against the united states. >> glenn, you and i know, when you aim for the king, you best not met miss. you have to have beyond and to the exclusion of every reasonable doubt to convict. do you think this is a problem here? someone like donald trump, i would use the word, savvy, this is too much credit. he never put anything in writing. he never had the phone. do you think there's enough smoking gun evidence to actually indict and convict? >> it's a great question. what h...

Six committee to open with the first witness that we saw. it video clip of the testimony, it was bill barr. it was a surprise to me. i did not think he would be the first witness that we saw. i think they did this for two reasons. one, bill barr in one word, an expletive at what's at that, laid to rest any question of whether he had corrupt intent. he said i went into the oval office and said, mister president, your claims of election fraud are bs. katie, you know how we prove corrupt in tenth in court? we have to try to infer that they have corrupt intent basquiat on facts, evidence, and circ...

Upon herself to convey that, those are jennings, and to convey that to the white house. that is the application of the overthrow the government by force. it is their indication, to your mind, that members of congress should be facing criminal charges for their involvement? >> i haven't reached a conclusion on that point, but i do agree certainly with the judge in california, judge carter, that there is compelling evidence that the president of the united states and others engaged with very possible criminal activity to obstruct congress, to defraud the united states, to engage in conspiracy. i...

Did he encourage the violence? and that plays into the committee chairman's notion that they may refer this to the department of justice for prosecution because the only way you can prosecute donald trump is if you can show that he obstructed congress and had a corrupt intent. corrupt intent certainly would encompass encouraging violence to stop that vote. so that is why that is so crucial. it's also crucial to get some witnesses that can tell you what happened or documents that can show donald trump's state of mind during that period of time. >> we know they've spoken with approximately 300 p...