Stay updated with breaking news from Crime itself. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
outs of attorney/client privilege. what could trump be forced to disclose? >> ordinarily, you don't have to testify about those meetings. however, prosecutors can break through the privilege if they can establish that the conversations related somehow to an ongoing crime, not talking about a crime that was committed in the past, but as attorney and client, talking about something that is a crime itself. if you can establish that, then you can get access to testimony about what those conversations were. and of course if that's the case, that'll go right to the heart of the obstruction issue here. >> and how politically significant would an obstruction case be, or might it add fuel to the fire, all these republican allegations of the justice department being wep aponized b the biden administration? >> here's the real-world dilemma the prosecutors face. ordinarily if you want to charge obstruction, it's the last count in the document. you charge an underlying crime then obstruction. >> right, here's the crime, another crime, another crime,
potential suspect by saying someone is withholding information? >> no, i think they are fishing. this case is, you know, seven weeks into it. i think a lot of resources have drained off. they still have some fbi agents and they really need more analysts, in my opinion, going through the data that they have using artificial intelligence and case management application that the fbi brings to the table. but i think they are fishing for more leads. they may know a lot about the crime itself, or the crimes, and they have virtual layouts of the crime scene, trace evidence, but i don't think they know anything about the killer. >> gillian: when you say you think they need to bring more analysts in, is the implication there that they are understaffed in some capacity? >> you never can get enough analysts in a case like this. when i read about the number of leads that they have, tips that have come in from the public,
raymond dearie, now says team trump has to back up any claims of the fbi planting evidence at mar-a-lago during last month's search. and they have to do it in a sworn declaration. they also have to say whether they are claiming that any of the items on the inventory list were not taken from the premises. remember, it's one thing to make those claims outside of court. it is a whole nother thing to do so in court where a lie could be a crime itself. and trump and his allies have been claiming it, without proof, for weeks, including this from the former president just last night. >> did they drop anything into those piles? or did they do it later? there's no chain of custody here with them. >> wouldn't that be on video tape potentially? >> no, i don't think so. i mean, they were in a room. >> the judge says, prove it. and gave trump's team one week from tomorrow to reveal the evidence. our sources suggest trump was considering releasing so-called
and since february, about one third of ukrainians, 1:30 ukrainians have been displaced out of their homeland, a mounting to the largest refugee immigration crisis in europe to date, since the aftermath of world war ii. but the new crime itself, the united nations has found that another 6.3 million people have been internally displaced, as the repercussions of war have forced many of them of their homes. gentlemen now is the international rescue committee's ukraine country director, -- thank you for coming on today, first of all. in less than six months, more than 12 million people have left their homes in ukraine to seek protection from war. the united nations reports that over 6.3 million refugees from
unexplored. >> you talk about pottinger and so right to mention how high ranking an official he was, and someone who served in -- as an intelligence official in afghanistan, under then lieutenant general michael flynn, someone in the room for some key meetings about u.s. relations with china, and key meetings that trump was having. he had so much exposure. this hearing, this final hearing is about those 187 minutes. what was trump doing and not doing during the insurrection. can you talk about what he could testify to or gaps that he may fill for this committee as it relates to dare ss to derelict which is not a crime itself, but could go to the issue of intent or aiding and abetting. >> yeah, poppy. so of those 187 minutes, really at this point we only have a couple brief snapshots of what donald trump was doing or saying. we have seen his tweets. i think one of the most important pieces of evidence is the tweet donald trump said at 2:24, about an hour into this
cub scout and it's one of those things where you step back and you say what happened? this is mayor rode a ring when about this in the last day. this is someone like hutto do some become this angry or hateful to take it out on innocent people having an instant day out? when asked about what she knew about him as a child, she simply responded he was just a little boy. >> david: just little boy but you look at him now with the tattoo on his face of a scar, tattoos of up and down his neck. something clearly happened, of course social media, think lee's been taken down, but again, the authorities have it and they are going to scour that to see any signs not only of the events leading up to the crime itself, but also trying to get inside the mind of somebody like this. how did that transfer takes place? may we were talking at the break. how many more crazy people are there out there that are inspired to do it by what they see on social media?
trying to head toward a criminal referral for the actual -- not just the criminal contempt but the actual crime itself, but merrick garland doesn't seem to want to go there. if they were investigating this, alisyn, they would not let the select committee proceed the way that they have. they are stepping out of the way, and that to me says they really just don't want to do it. >> alyssa, as someone who was so close to this and who was trying to stop january 6 as it was happening, and who saw the inner workings as you did of the white house, now that some of this is coming to light, what are your thoughts? >> i think it's deeply disturbing. i worked with donald trump and agreed with about 75% of his policies, but the people around him thought they had the right to disenfranchise 80%-plus voters because they didn't get their way in the election is horrifying. i think we'll see repercussions to come of just questioning the democratic process at large. i worry, honestly, for midterms to see other smaller candidates
reassure retailers, are you reassuring retailers and buyers, shoppers, that there's nothing to fear? >> absolutely. you know, this is -- you know, nothing can be guaranteed, but i can say this. as for as reassurance, you know, our officers are out on the streets right now as we speak and have been out on the street, and as you come to san francisco, particularly in these retail corridors like union square you're going to see a lot more officers, and our officers are engaging, our command staff is engaging, and we're trying to reassure people. you know, when you go and talk to the people that have been directly impacted by this, they need that reassurance because the fear of crime is almost as bad as crime itself, and when people show up for work and they don't know whether they are going to be robbed or assaulted or somebody is going to run into the store with hammers and golf clubs and guns and take advantage of that situation. we have to reassure poem and i
Antje Rávik Strubels Roman "Blaue Frau": Nah im Unerkundbaren - Kultur pnn.de - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from pnn.de Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Antje Rávik Strubels Roman "Blaue Frau": Nah im Unerkundbaren - Kultur pnn.de - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from pnn.de Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.