Page 4 - Daca Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

The policy while the lower court challenges play out through the federal courts of appeal. the earliest the supreme court could take this case now is next term. the term that begins in october. so if the case comes back to the supreme court and if they decide to take it, then the earliest that this could be changed is for perhaps at least a year or so. so the military will have another year or so to go ahead and enforce this policy and they are now saying that they will do so. that they believe that the policy is important for military readiness. something the lower courts have rejected, craig...

Cave. >> really quick, either he is showing he is willing to give, or perhaps he has even forgotten himself the various sequence of events that have, you know, happened, leading up to this, because some of the overtures that he is willing to make today, reportedly, seem to be overtures that have already been made, whether they were failed, or offered some incentives. >> exactly. i mean there was a broader version of the deal that was offered a year ago in the previous shutdown impasse. but vice president pence himself has rejected, when we asked him on capitol hill, what about a daca for wall ...

Obstructionist and that will help him. he always said he preferred the senate plan to his own plan. i don't think that will happen but i think you will hear the words infrastructure frequently. >> immigration? >> what is the question? >> the question is, is that there is a deal to be made and in this case there's a very easy deal to be made on dreamers if he wants to and if the democrats want to? >> if he wants to. that would be the narrowest of deals. the doj just filed the supreme court take up the daca case. i am not sure how you pivot from that to let's make a deal. the rhetoric of his cam...

Or at the very least, constitutional determinations of the type we are seeing in this daca case. they should be referred to the appellate judges, three-judge panel or maybe an on banc panel of the whole court. they are far more knowledgeable on constitutional knowledgeable on constitutional and all these matters. the tyranny especially of the district court bench has to end. the people's will should no longer be held hostage to the capricious whims of one ill-equipped disgruntled life tenured jurist. that's the angle. joining me now for reaction are. rnc national committee woman. scott bolden....

Way to impact the daca case. perhaps he's figured out here that having public statements could harm an ultimate position in litigation with stormy daniels, whether that's in court or in some form of adjudication that's outside of the public eye. in addition, it's got to be awfully difficult for the president to counterpunch with a wife and a family at home. and those sorts of family sensitivities may have given him the impetus to remain quiet. >> philip on a broadcast you are frequently a congress on, a broadcast i never miss here at 4:00 every afternoon, nicolle wallace today did her broadcas...