Page 27 - David Ignacious News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

The speech was contradictory, that's a part of the psyche of america's role in the world. >> he definitely made clear he believes kim jong-un will only respond to military force. he gave a nod to north korea, he personally said speaking man-to-man, i will destroy, that's dangerous, it's an escalation and takes it to a place that maybe we don't want to be or haven't been before. i believe he believes the only thing that will respond to north korea. >> i think one of the interesting things in this speech, david alluded to it, here you have a president that sound different nine months in or eight...

Addressing the u.n. general assembly today. still ahead on ""morning joe,"" it's hard, still ahead on ""morning joe,"" we have a packed show to name a few of our guests, new york city mayors past and present, bill deblasio and michael bloomberg. new jersey governor chris christie, tone blair, tom brokaw, catty kay, senator claire mccaskill, david ignacious, all in the making. in the future, a nation's technology will determine its power. in its economy, in medicine, in science and in national security. one company designs and builds more supercomputers than any other. an american company. hewl...

To europe with regard to nato, with regard to everything he says about north korea, it's not so important or so much what donald trump says, it's what others hear. what do they hear in north korea. what do they hear in nato and europe? what do they hear? what do the people our allies and our enemies here. what do they take from it? >> what we are seeing more from overseas, david ignacious is starting to discount his tweets starting to learn to discount his words, starting to understand that sometimes comes out of the mouth of general mattis or rex tillerson or nikki haley. there is a huge divi...

>> breakfast of astronauts. hey, jeffrey, before we get into this. i want to talk to you about north cre why. we had bob wootdwadward on here bob and richard haase and david ignacious. we were talking about whether we have a binary choice to north korea. either we're fine with north korea having nuclear weapons that can kill millions of peel on our west coast or we're going to have to take some sort of military action to stop them. bob woodward does not think it's a binary choice. he thinks we can still strike a deem. richard haase is not quite so sure. what is your take on north korea? what a...

Obvious possible war. we will have to live with exactly the risks you layout. >> can we live with those risks for north korea? >> well -- >> can we live with the risks of kim jong-un, somebody as unbalanced as him being able to reach soeshlths portland, los angeles with a nuclear weapon? >> it won't be that, if we don't stop tear production of warheads and missiles, they will increase the amount, the number of american citizens and cities they can hold at risk. that's why it will be a controversial decision between using force or living with that strategic risk you talk about. >> richard haase...