Page 27 - Defense Perspective News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

They don't believe it than i think congress should continue to look into this. when you take a look at this. how does all of this play out from a defense perspective. also the fourth article. it does not apply to president trump. the removal section for deals with when a president has a serious illness where they are basically unconscious they have a terminal illness. not just because a few members of the president's cabinet does not like his personality or his decision-making so that's where we need to start that. it does not apply and it won't be used to remove the present.

Not. the question becomes will they have any case at all. you need to remember a little bit from the defense perspective, they tried to make their case through the cross-examination of government witnesses and the reason i don't think there will be a significant case is that that p particularly on the cross-examination of rick gates, the government's main cooperating witness. so if they have any case, it will likely be a short one, and we may actually go into closing arguments this afternoon. >> this is walter, daniel. i wanted to ask you. do you think that they're going to have to try to coun...

The latest news and information from around the world with host Ana Cabrera.

Giuliani praised michael cohen. let me play it for you. >> the man is an honest, honorable lawyer. >> michael is not going to lie. he is going to tell the truth. >> giuliani is saying believe cohen. >> when i was questioned by donald as to whether to hire giuliani, i was not in favor of giuliani. >> i didn't think he had knowledge of how to handle the case two defense perspective. he was a long-time prosecutor. he didn't know how to set a case up. the possible impeachment of a witness such as cohen. now, we don't know that cohen would tell the truth. it's entirely likely that given precedent a...

Submitted information to the bank that was faulty in an effort to get a loan. it's not about trump, not about any tie in to trump. you'll move from a defense perspective to preclude that. if you're charging the executive because you say he did something amiss, that's another story for another day. i think the special counsel is trying to tie that in. i think the tie-in in and of itself makes it prejudicial. it will be up to the special counsel or someone else to make a decision as to whether the executive did anything wrong. but there are decisions made about giving loans that are based on dis...