Deir States News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

the ceqa section guidelines at 15262 says that a project involving only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions, which the agency board or commission has not approved, adopted, or funded, does not require the preparation of an 10th eir or negative declaration. but we did fund this study. outcome is not subject to an environmental report? i think those points were made earlier. it is also contained in the letter we received. i think -- i appreciate leaving the cnr documents in appendix c, the video simulation of the proposed project along the embarcadero. for me, i...

>> let me start with something that was handed out before i lose this piece of paper. it has to do with of st. loading and it cites a planning code section 154b3 as allowing a substitute way of meeting the third full of street parking loading space which he described. i also understood that this provision applies to c-3. how is it that we can take a provision that is allowed in one zoning district and apply it to another zoning district? is it because if we approve deu -- dsud then it applies to that? >> this applies through the process in the code wherein the sponsor can request mod...

i do not think these issues were properly addressed in the comments in response to the document. there is a statement in the comments and responses that says new information must be significant information that identifies a substantial increase in the severity of an impact. my question is, doesn't the increase of the number of trips from 20 to 90 constitute significant new information? on page 3c23, beginning on 21, this is in reference to the northeast embarcadero study. mr. guy said that this product is consistent with the northeast embarcadero study. also, i believe that the proje...

than two trucks being loaded at one time. i do not think it will turn off their engines. there must be an increase in emissions, the amount of traffic that is generated, impacts to intersections. i do not think these issues were properly addressed in the comments in response to the document. there is a statement in the comments and responses that says new information must be significant information that identifies a substantial increase in the severity of an impact. my question is, doesn't the increase of the number of trips from 20 to 90 constitute significant new information? on pa...

-- emissions. i would think that trucks that would be at the site in that volume, there is a headway of about two minutes each. i do not know how trucks go back quickly except if there are more than two trucks being loaded at one time. i do not think it will turn off their engines. there must be an increase in emissions, the amount of traffic that is generated, impacts to intersections. i do not think these issues were properly addressed in the comments in response to the document. there is a statement in the comments and responses that says new information must be significant inform...