Page 3 - Dependency Programs News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Help. >> sean: i'd like to save social security for further generations. they raided the lockbox. let me go back to the time you were mayor. i was on the radio in new york. you got hammered. you were satan in the minds of the "new york times," right? >> right. >> sean: but you stuck to your anyone else. you knew you were right, it could be better, but they beat you every day. you'd go into every neighborhood, whether people voted for you or not, you'd meet the press in new york, have fights with them every day. you were chris christie before he was chris christie. you took your message out and...

Help. >> sean: i'd like to save social security for further generations. they raided the lockbox. let me go back to the time you were mayor. i was on the radio in new york. you got hammered. you were satan in the minds of the "new york times," right? >> right. >> sean: but you stuck to your anyone else. you knew you were right, it could be better, but they beat you every day. you'd go into every neighborhood, whether people voted for you or not, you'd meet the press in new york, have fights with them every day. you were chris christie before he was chris christie. you took your message out and...

Medicaid, rest of it. then they say in the same paragraph or two, of course, 50% of the people don't pay any federal taxes. the assumption would be therefore that those people are taking and not receiving. or receiving not taking or both. they're receiving -- you get my point. and the hair tage foundation said those people do pay for the very same dependency programs because they payton roll taxes. when they do that, they are, in fact, paying for dependency. if you were eric who paid off the mortgage, but say you are a "wall street journal" guy. investment guy. you have a house in the hamptons...

Medicaid, rest of it. then they say in the same paragraph or two, of course, 50% of the people don't pay any federal taxes. the assumption would be therefore that those people are taking and not receiving. or receiving not taking or both. they're receiving -- you get my point. and the hair tage foundation said those people do pay for the very same dependency programs because they payton roll taxes. when they do that, they are, in fact, paying for dependency. if you were eric who paid off the mortgage, but say you are a "wall street journal" guy. investment guy. you have a house in the hamptons...

Generations with social security that is underfunded, and we have to take those who are successful and seniors and have reduced wealth. tax on labor makes it uncompetitive, and the idea somebody on the left would raise those taxes to subsidize high income seniors doesn't make sense to me. and including housing programs, block rent them, and send it back to the states and require work and put a time limit. you do those three things, and we will help take those programs, which are now dependency programs, and you take them to transitional programs to help people move out of poverty.