Determinant Amount News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

This is an incredibly weak, baseless, convoluted indictment, it is bizarrely centered around what is clearly protected speech, zero criminal statutes, because there are none that were applicable that are actually written into law. It is based on an obscure law from the civil war. Lets be even more clear, this indictment is frankly not worth the paper it is printed on. This is a political persecution, through and through. There is a reason Donald Trumps poll numbers keep going up every single time he goes through yet another attack like this. By liberal activist attorneys general. American peop...

This is an incredibly weak, baseless, convoluted indictment, it is bizarrely centered around what is clearly protected speech, zero criminal statutes, because there are none that were applicable that are actually written into law. It is based on an obscure law from the civil war. Lets be even more clear, this indictment is frankly not worth the paper it is printed on. This is a political persecution, through and through. There is a reason Donald Trumps poll numbers keep going up every single time he goes through yet another attack like this. By liberal activist attorneys general. American peop...

Get your take on this. >> yeah, i've never seen indictment this messy and sloppy in my life. you know, really at the end of the day, they are saying it is not, it should be matter what donald trump thought or didn't think but instead, they tried to use a reasonable person test to suggest that because the director radcliffe, attorney general bar and others had told president they lost somehow, no reasonable person would believe that. and all this indictment a thing that's fascinating to me, is that jack smith and ms. there was fraud in the last election. he says essentially that there wasn't th...

Siding with the argument that there was not a determinant amount of loss here, there was not a huge amount of harm done here, as is the case in many typical fraud cases so that seems to be the tone of it now. that's something that the judge is trying to decide, was there a loss here, who was harmed in this situation? the prosecutors have argued that it was the university, it was the testing services, that were harmed, their reputations at least, and while the defense is saying essentially, this is something that was a breaking of the rules, not a breaking of the law, and it is a news helicopte...