This is an incredibly weak, baseless, convoluted indictment, it is bizarrely centered around what is clearly protected speech, zero criminal statutes, because there are none that were applicable that are actually written into law. It is based on an obscure law from the civil war. Lets be even more clear, this indictment is frankly not worth the paper it is printed on. This is a political persecution, through and through. There is a reason Donald Trumps poll numbers keep going up every single time he goes through yet another attack like this. By liberal activist attorneys general. American people are seeing through all of this, and joe biden socalled department of justice, is now officially completely out of control, joe biden ag Merrick Garland, who signed off on this charade, remember, the department of justice as part of the executive branch. Theyve now gone full Banana Republic. Hes not even making any attempt to reason even the appearance of fairness. Garland and other democrats in the doj are now trying to jail joe bidens chief political opponent, all in the lead up to an election. They want donald trump in jail for the rest of his life. All are protecting the big guy any and all legitimate and real scrutiny look at this timeline. June 7, the fbi finally gives congress 1023 form that they did not want to hand over. First had to overcome eventually redacted. Then you get to see it. Then only thanks to senator grassley, we get to see it. Anyway, that Document Bribery Allegations against joe and hunter biden. From a credible source. A credible source because the fbi paid this informant in the past, hundreds of thousands dollars. The very next day, june 8, the doj jack smith, Indicts Donald Trump in the maralago document case. Okay, mere coincidence. July 26, hunter biden unprecedented Sweetheart Deal with the doj, was introduced in court. Then rejected by federal judge. The very next day july 27, jack smith adds even more charges and the trump maralago document case. I guess pretty weird, another odd coincidence, right . But theres more. July 31, that will be yesterday. Hunter biden former Business Partner, testifies before congress, that joe biden was on over 20 calls and in person meetings with his son, hunters Business Partners. That of course, contradicted the big lie as both a candidate and as president , that he never one time, even talk to his son hunter, or his brother or anyone for that matter, Quote Unquote about their Farm Business dealings. This includes bereavement executives, devon archer yesterday. Pressured hunters connections in dc. Why . They wanted to remove the ukrainian prosecutor that joe biden ultimately forced out in less than six hours, leveraging 1 billion of your tax dollars to do it. And by the way, the net result of that, he helped enrich his son and family in the process. And here we are, the very next day, another coincidence . Which is today, august 1, jack smith Indicts Donald Trump once again, over the riot on january 6. Although, not really about the riot. Despite trumps direction to peacefully, many of you will not peacefully and patriotically march to the capitol so your voices will be heard. By the way, which is not in the indictment. The certification of the 2020 election, was delayed by a few hours, because of the riots. Now joe bidens doj wants donald trump to spend the rest of his life in prison. By the way, the doj and not even charging trump with causing the riots. They completely ignored the criminal referrals from the pointless january 6 committee and that committee of course ignored the most important discovery that they had. That was our Intelligence Community had actionable intelligence him on over allegations that donald trump work behind the scenes, to obstruct an official proceeding. An official proceeding that went on as planned, albeit a few hours late. Apparently, questioning election results. That will be Freedom Of Speech and i guess that is now as of today, illegal in our country. Unless of course you are nancy pelosi or Hillary Clinton. Or minority leader jeffries or Stacey Abrams in georgia. Or any other democratic candidate who objects to electing results every time a republican wins. Of course, donald trump in this case, would be tried in washington d. C. Where pretty much, nobody voted for him. Almost everyone hates his guts, does it sound like a fair venue . Washington d. C. , we went back and looked. Only 5. 4 percent of the city actually voted for donald trump. New york city, donald trump is also facing bogus charges, a whopping 12 percent voted from there. If you look at fulton county, georgia, for this coming next. Where trump will likely face charges. He received a whopping 26 percent of the vote. Really think donald trump can get a fair trial in new york city, washington d. C. , and fulton county, georgia . A real jury of his peers . I dont think so. The doj jack smith doesnt seem to care, and according to former governor mcdonald, who smith got a guilty plea with, that a guilty plea, guilty verdict on, you know, smith would rather win then get it wrong. Those are mcdonald structure were to remember, Jack Smith Ruined Mcdonald Structure with causing him to go bankrupt over his legal fees. Before the case against mcdonald was overturned by a Unanimous Supreme Court decision. It will be 90, the Justice System. Mcdonald, trump and other republicans, sadly in this country, are forced to endure in these times. But if youre joe biden, you can allegedly sell access to the highest levels of the us government, leverage taxpayer dollars, and by the way, sell access to people from china, russia, ukraine, kazakhstan, romania, mexico and a dozen countries, no consequences will he face at all. A few million dollars, oligarchs from around the world, they get direct access to the big guy. That included phone calls and meetings facilitated by his son, hunter. There was hunter the brand come hunter what . The crack smoker, crack addict, the guy that likes prostitutes. The brand they talked about or devon archer talked about joe biden. Of course, protect was also part of that package. Executives as you recall from yesterday, used the biden name to shield, to prevent investigations, they later pressured hunter to call dc, to help get a pesky ukrainian prosecutor fired. According to the Bribery Allegations from that fbi source, executives believe the price was steep, they didnt want to pay it. But they had to pay the bidens 5 million to 1 5,000,002 another 10 million in total. It will take 10 years for people to discover how they made the payment. It really makes you wonder why hunter reportedly encouraged archer to buy a burner phone ahead of their appointment to the board. And three days before meeting at the obama white house, with then Vice President biden, heres what hunter allegedly emailed his Business Partner quote by a cell phone from a 711 or cvs tomorrow, and ill do the same. Why do they need a burner phone ahead of the meeting at the white house . Where joe biden would be. And by the way, is not only brief smile, they say what that message, im sitting here with my father. Why havent you followed through on your commitment . That of course was with the chinese Business Partner, also the energy business, hunter had no expertise in energy. But remember, they paid millions for the biden brand within a week including the one is this man nicknamed the super chairman but dont take my word for it, according to another email from hunter quote your question, why the super chair love me so much . Its easily answered. It has nothing to do with me and everything to do with my last name. And i bring along a very handsome aryan garlic men wherever i go. Okay. Now, just imagine that emails from donald trump jr. Or eric trump or ivanka trump, do you think the media would care, do you think democrats would care . You think the doj, this doj would take note of that . I think they would. Apparently for last name is biden, even clinton, but if her last name is biden, you can do anything you want. You can allegedly sell access to the highest Government Office in the land, you can skip out on taxes, engage with prostitutes, smoke crack regularly and light on your current application. That gun could be tossed in a dumpster across the street from high school, and if youre joe biden you have a last name biden, you can participate in your sons shady International Business team and lie about it and no one bats an eyelash, known in the media, theres a lot to about trumprussia collision for three years, and nobody in the democratic party. At the same time, the weapon eyes doj that we are living under and the politicized fbi, will help Sweep Everything under the rug for the bidens. Now we are left with one basic fundamental question, who is going to hold the doj and the fbi accountable . Not the rankandfile i want to be clear. They are putting their lives on want to protect us every day. Im talking at the upper echelon. Are we now living in america where equal justice is dead. Equal application of laws is a thing of the past. The shredding of our constitution, witnessing this in real time in front of our own eyes. Is it past time to impeach Merrick Garland . Is it time to flush out all of the democratic activists out of the bureaucracy and The Deep State . Tonight harvard law professor, alan dershowitz, forill be shocked if you dont agree with my assessment. That this case really boils down to a disagreement over the speech and opinions donald j trump. And i nacvely believe professor, that Freedom Of Speech, was foundational to our constitution. Was i wrong . You are not wrong. The only Freedom Of Speech, but freedom to protect the government in the indictment, they know that their freedoms. Within the claim that donald, this is a key point, donald trump actually believed that he lost the election. The everything he did, was fraudulent, they conspired with unnamed lawyers mostly, to affect the election. You are allowed to challenge elections in the best way is to come up with the slate of alternate electives, thats what the court said. In 1960, thats throughout history. Subjectively, donald trump, actually believed that he lost the election, and acted contrary to the bleak peter read the indictment carefully. There is no smoking gun. There is no one who is credibly prepared to testify that donald trump said to him, i know personally, i lost the election. A lot of people told me he lost the election but you know donald trump and you he will make up his own mind. And theyll have a very hard time proving it. District of columbia, with a percentage of the jury pool voted against him. So, they may actually get this from a dc jury but will survive appellate review and review in the Supreme Court . I dont think so. I do not think so either and i agree with your assessment. I dont think you get a fair trial in new york, i dont think you get a Fair Trial In Dc and i dont think you get a fair trial in fulton county, professor, to be very blunt. I think both counties, let me get to all the other guest. I will let you way and next, your thoughts on this. This indictment strikes me as amateur joke. Frankie, jack smith and Special Counsel should be indicted for stupidity, its that bad. But he has this reputable habit of bringing politically driven prosecutions by contorting the law in mangling evidence and these four this definition of a stretch, a gumby indictment Conspiracy To Defraud the government because donald trump challenged certification of electors on january 6. Hes entitled to do the under the electoral act, democrats did the same thing in 2016, ending prior elections. Nor is it a crime to claim the election was stolen with Hillary Clinton and nancy pelosi four years earlier and the main point is, if donald trump truly believed he one, even if he was wrong about it, and he used the Legal Process to contest the outcome as the law clearly permits, that is not election fraud, and then smith causes an Obstruction Charge Conspiracy charge, those are redundant of the first charge in the exact same defense applies. This is a Junk Indictment and it is politically motivated. Matt whitaker, you worked for the doj, lets get your take on this. Yeah, ive never seen indictment this messy and sloppy in my life. You know, really at the end of the day, they are saying it is not, it should be matter what donald trump thought or didnt think but instead, they tried to use a reasonable person test to suggest that because the director radcliffe, Attorney General Bar and others had told president they lost somehow, no reasonable person would believe that. And all this indictment a thing thats fascinating to me, is that jack smith and ms. There was fraud in the last election. He says essentially that there wasnt the outcome Determinant Amount of fraud, but enough fraud. This trial if and when it goes could have really interesting evidence on how much fraud is in the american system and frankly how much for the americans are willing to withstand. We discussed a lot of issues like laws for example, partisan observers, are allowed to watch the vote count not from a dozen feet away, that didnt happen according to the law in some states, professor. Then you have the issue in pennsylvania, the issue in wisconsin. A stinging dissent by the Supreme Court justice in the state of wisconsin, a three afour case but basically saying that the fellow justices are not following the law. Or in pennsylvania. The State Constitution had very strict rules as it comes to the issue of voting by mail and they tried to circumvent the process of amending the constitution, by merely passing legislation. These are legitimate questions from a legal Point Of View. They arent he understood and believed whether he was right or wrong, the Real Question is where the truck take place ever nobody said its going to be the district of columbia, we know the judge, obama appointee. That is not certain. First motion his lawyers would make will be Change Of Venue to northern virginia, where the jury pool will be fair. And he will transfer. Know the vision is heavily democrat also pick was not nearly as much is district of columbia. And you can go further. Southern virginia, where its much more even. You can elude to in a dream state. This is a federal indictment so it is not to be tried within the state or the area pretty can make a motion or Change Of Venue. I think the lawyers will be kept busy moving to dismiss the indictment on First Amendment grounds. Living for a Change Of Venue, they will probably argue some form of selective prosecution. But the key point is going to be that the prosecution has to go to the jury, donald trump s subjective belief and people who know donald trump say, he really believed it. You know donald trump. Do you think he believed it . I do. I think he believed it. You know donald trump, do you think he believed it . I have talked to him about it. And you know, he truly believes it. I disagree. I have on record saying i thought he lost. But he has a right to his own opinion. Matt whitaker, do you believe by telling the electors, that hes entitled to do that, thats not a crime. Matt, do you believe that, you know as well . I talked to him a lot about these issues and i think you did seriously and honestly believe the election was unfair and if an honest count had been made he would have won. I think he passed a lie detector test. That result here, a Group Professor dershowitz. I believe he cant given a Fair Trial In Dc the trials in dc, its complete it will b guilty verdict. What happens on the field, does he win . Real quick, exit question. Yes absolutely 100 percent he wins on appeal. Either in the Circuit Court of appeals or Supreme Court. Are right and matt, do you think he wins . I do. Because ultima, the righteous about taking away individuals right and ill see an individual where his right has been taken away. Chris professor, the less sense. I cut you off, go ahead. I think he may lose in the unisys court of appeals for the dc circuit. But i think you will probably win the United StatesSupreme Court. With the grant review and they should grant review. When you have the president of United States people going after his opponent in a political election, it has to be beyond reproach. Has to be without any prompt the strongest case in history this doesnt meet that standard. Well said all of you, great analysis. Tonight, editorinchief and founder Breaking News Report on evidence given to the Special Counsel at the 11th hour, this from former nypd commissioner, bernie he joins us not to explain. This