Didnt Question News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Tweet and propo kbgate the idea that interference by russia was a hoax. And we all remember the debacle in helsinki, i wish i had heard just some of the righteous indignation that we had heard in the committee today when the president questioned that fundamental conclusion of our intelligence agencies. But of course they will silent when the president said that. They will show indignation today, but they will cower when they hear the president questioning the very conclusions that our Intelligence Community has reached. But we saw Something Interesting also today. My colleagues sought to use y...

The brakes. joe, you cover this for a living. what do you make of the media rush to judgment? >> i will take the media perspective on jussie smollett in terms of a rush to judgment. many in the industry portrayed him as a victim of a hate crime and didn't question his stories. robin roberts of abc news the highest paid person in this industry bought his tale, hook line and sinker. the target was donald trump and his supporters. they just happened to be wandering around chicago during the polar vortex and they were carrying bleach in search of actors in 2 a.m. it was presented as gospel. as for...

On an insecure line in a country known for russian telecommunications and eavesdropping, that's more than indiscretion, that's a security risk. but why attack you, mr. holmes? they didn't question anything you said. they didn't question what conversation you overheard ambassador sondland didn't question what you said. he acknowledged that the one thing the president wanted to know the day after that conversation with zelensky was is he going to do the investigations. and sondland said, yes, he'll do anything you ask. they don't question that. so why attack you? they didn't question your testim...

President on a secure line in a country known for russian telecommunications and eavesdropping. that's more than an indiscretion, that's a security risk. but why attack you, mr. holmes? they didn't question anything that you said. they didn't question what conversation you overheard. ambassador sondland didn't question what you said. he acknowledged that the one thing that president wanted to know the day after that conversation with zelensky was, is he going to do the investigations? and sondland said, yes, he will do anything you ask. they don't question that. so why attack you? they didn't ...

Well, i think you are quite right. the indiscretion is when the ambassador calls the president on an unsecure line on a country known for russian telecommunications and eavesdropping. that's more than indiscretion. that's a security risk. but why attack you, mr. holmes? they didn't question anything you said. they didn't question what conversation you overheard. ambassador sondland, indeed, didn't question what you said. he acknowledged that the one thing the president wanted to know the day after the conversation with zelensky is is he going to do the investigations. and sondland said, yes, h...