Page 30 - Diego Sanchez News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Or person per block then your Service Levels are different for all different facilities, streetscapes, parks. We might be coming back to you to talking about how the Capital Planning committee is interested in using that information to do our overall city capital plan for all infrastructure. How do we think about the upcoming residents and growth. The second piece, i think we do actually get to thinking about if bill is higher density. That bill is generating more demand for transit and contributing at a higher rate. The per square foot is a proxy for number of people or number of jobs, either...

Because what its trying to do is have a Level Service or a citywide basis in an area with lower density residents you dont need as much transit as the higher density area so when we worked on the Capital Planning meeting, is to affect all impact fees and if you are in a neighborhood with a high person per acre which is the term we use or person per block then your Service Levels are different for all different facilities, streetscapes, parks. We might be coming back to you to talking about how the Capital Planning committee is interested in using that information to do our overall city capital...

Worked on the Capital Planning meeting, is to affect all impact fees and if you are in a neighborhood with a high person per acre which is the term we use or person per block then your Service Levels are different for all different facilities, streetscapes, parks. We might be coming back to you to talking about how the Capital Planning committee is interested in using that information to do our overall city capital plan for all infrastructure. How do we think about the upcoming residents and growth. The second piece, i think we do actually get to thinking about if bill is higher density. That ...

Different now we dont see them deft from retail use so thats why we are recommending citywide. So i heard that the maker of the motion was amenable to the secondary. Depends on how you phrase the recommendation. As i heard the motion it is to dpaupt a recommendation for approval as amended to limit the amendment for only the upper Market Street and ct with the recommendation to the board to expand it citywide and to continue the discussion for possible citywide im more comfortable with the openended type of im sorry to continue the discussions. To consider a thats correct its a different meani...

But for San Francisco survival thats what we need are that i want to pick up on the Fishermans Wharf benefit district by the way, who was voted the best in San Francisco number of employees that work at Fishermans Wharf and the all the hotels and restaurants we enjoy a large percentage live in San Francisco this is the optimum job creation live and work in the city situation that we created but he speaking the truth about folks not being able to get to the wafer and companies that are willing to provide insurance and retain the employees it is a very serious problem this will help address that...