Page 40 - Direction Commission News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

C as set forth in the [inaudible]. Speaker mr. Keane. Speaker ill second that. Those two specific aspects, the Supreme Court of the United States has been rather definitive that thats something that we cannot indeed enforce. And we did vote a few months ago exactly the way commissioner reanne is proposing and we voted unanimously thats not in our power. On those i dont have a problem with, and i think its redundant and i second mr. Hurt. Speaker all in favor. Speaker aye. Speaker opposed. Hearing none that motion passes. Speaker can you go to the next. Speaker thank you, chair. The second set ...

Installations, but we do want to create as much green space in this area as well so this large lawn you see in the center flanked by a series of trees, the lawn would have a series of steps, but the ability to create a seating environment in that space would create some soft scape so thats very usable. Thats where we are with the landscape and project. Thank you very much. Very good. Thank you. I want to conclude that were taking all these comments and working on putting them in the Schematic Design and will come back to you in march for the approval along with the disposition and Development ...

Those two specific aspects, the Supreme Court of the United States has been rather definitive that thats something that we cannot indeed enforce. And we did vote a few months ago exactly the way commissioner reanne is proposing and we voted unanimously thats not in our power. On those i dont have a problem with, and i think its redundant and i second mr. Hurt. Speaker all in favor. Speaker aye. Speaker opposed. Hearing none that motion passes. Speaker can you go to the next. Speaker thank you, chair. The second set of amendments is with respect to reporting requirements for third parties who a...

Thank you. Speaker so im happy to hear from other commissioners on this particular one. I mean, to me this one seems pretty clear. If we think we need to defer it to another meeting, im happy to consider this with other issues, but i also dont want to have to revisit things that weve already addressed. You know, to mr. Bushs point, i also dont think that we have to deal with all c fro changes in one meeting. Theres other c fro changes we can address. I do think mr. Bush raises a good point if there are things that we havent addressed that we should be, lets take those up. I dont know that we s...

We allow elected officials to have a general Purpose Committee which is not a candidate meeting. A general purpose meeting can accept contributions of any amount from any source where a candidate cannot. What we have seen is we have an elected official who has done that and accepted contributions, over 25,000 who has business for the city and being decide by that official. That will not be touched at all. It will be easy to have a prevision that says that the same restrictions that apply to candidate committees would apply to committees thats controlled by a candidate or Office Holder because ...