Page 2 - Due Process Analysis News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

That he frames his concurrence. he essentially says that all of these laws are no longer valid and the way that the court as struck down the due process analysis. he wants to see this court reevaluate each in every one of those decisions. >> jennifer, you came at this from a different perspective, a personal one. you wrote a personal piece on abortion for washington monthly just before the decision. what did you say in that piece, and how the now that we had this ruling, how have your reflections come out on this? how do you see this right now? >> i wrote the piece because back in december, i ...

We focus on privacy or autonomy or more specifically on abortion? >> i think whichever one of those you are focusing on, your honor, particularly if you focus on the right to abortion, each of those starts to become a step removed from what is provided in the constitution. yes, the constitution does provide certain -- protects certain aspects of privacy and autonomy and like but as this court said going directly from general concepts of autonomy, privacy, bodily integrity to a right is now how this court traditionally does due process analysis. i think it confirms whichever one of those you lo...

Privacy. does it make a difference that we focus on privacy or autonomy or more specifically on abortion? >> i think whichever one of those you're focusing on, you're honor, particularly if you're focusing on the right to abortion, each of those starts to become a step removed for what's provided in the constitution. yes, the constitution does provide -- protects certain aspects of privacy, on autonomy and the light, but going directly from general concepts of autonomy, of privacy, of bodily integrity, to a right is not how we traditionally, this court traditionally does due process analysis. ...

0 say. >> really? >> yeah. they used to be more polite. i have to say, the court over the last few years has gotten a bit more sharp in their questioning. and even sometimes to each other, and making digs at each other. that's an unfortunate trend. but i think for the most part, you'll hear a respectful discussion of the issues between the advocates and the court. maybe the most important thing to think about is when the justices are asking a question, they're not necessarily wanting to hear the answer from the advocate. they're making a point to one of the other justices. and so you as the ad...

Couple examples, standings of the states challenging an executive immigration order of a president. we had states asserting injury to the student is through several leaps of logic was a state of injury to the state itself. irrep raability. the court concluded the injury to the state, you can't repair it. the court was saying you can. we're talking about a national from a terror sponsoring region or country allowed to come in and then vanishes back into the fabric of america like the 9/11 hi line of scrimma hijackers did. you can't find that. the due process analysis. the court took the most fa...