Page 6 - Fee Moving News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Team led my stephany bowey. I continue to be proud of the work of the agency, but i have to say its strange to be working on projects that are so important to the city and at the same time not be a City Employee. Right now, when redevelopment projects end, our careers end, and it would be really detrimental for the city of San Francisco to lose the individuals who work on those projects. The Institutional Knowledge and experience would be a great loss and we have lost two people in the last month. My coworksers have put in years of work to improving the quality of life and would love to do so ...

The clarification. I am not sure. I mean i understand what you are saying. I just dont agree with the need for it. I think that everyone is agreement this is intended for employees at the Redevelopment Agency when it was dissolved by the state and those employees have to make the decision, i think by january 1st, 2015 of whether or not they are going to become City Employee and take advantage of this change. That is the intent. I think were all on the same page. That was our legal understanding and we thought the city attorneys understanding also. That is what we hope to do with this. Mr. Chai...

Im sorry i missioned missed the comment . The way it is there is language in a says that the employee has to make the decision by january 1,2015 and this was learly for employees clearly that shows that they are not currently a City Employee and this is for folks still in limbo that can make the transition now is our understanding. The Charter Amendment as currently drafted does not exactly reflect that. The Charter Amendment we could amend it to clarify that it is intended to cover employees who became City Employee after february 1, 2012 afterthe Redevelopment Agency dissolved. We keep talki...

You like to make a comment . Sure. I certainly would like to hear from local 21 or from 1021. I mean im still not clear why we would need the amendment or the clarification. I am not sure. I mean i understand what you are saying. I just dont agree with the need for it. I think that everyone is agreement this is intended for employees at the Redevelopment Agency when it was dissolved by the state and those employees have to make the decision, i think by january 1st, 2015 of whether or not they are going to become City Employee and take advantage of this change. That is the intent. I think were ...