Live Breaking News & Updates on Gary edmond

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Gary edmond on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Gary edmond and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Cosmos Briefing: Science vs law - Cosmos Magazine

Cosmos Briefing: Science v law
Experts discuss whether scientific evidence is properly considered in our courts.
Australia’s legal system should reconsider how seriously it regards scientific evidence, according to today’s Cosmos Briefing.
Recent genetic evidence has prompted dozens of eminent Australian scientists to petition for Kathleen Folbigg’s pardon, raising questions about the complicated relationship between science and the law.
Gary Edmond, a law professor at the University of NSW; Anna-Maria Arabia, chief executive of the Australian Academy of Science; and Richard O’Brien, an endocrinology professor at the University of Melbourne and frequent expert witness, came together to discuss this topic.

Australia , Melbourne , Victoria , Australian , Kathleen-folbigg , Gary-edmond , Anna-maria-arabia , Richard-obrien , University-of-melbourne , Australian-academy-of-science , Australian-academy , Richardo-brien

Cosmos Q&A: The clash between law and science

Cosmos Briefing: Science v law
Is scientific evidence properly considered in our courts?
The recent pardon petition by leading Australian scientists regarding the Kathleen Folbigg case – in which new scientific findings have shown her four children could have died of natural cases – has raised a number of questions about how specialised scientific evidence is regarded by our system of courts.
Cosmos has convened a webinar with Gary Edmond (law professor at University of NSW), Anna-Maria Arabia (chief executive of the Australian Academy of Science) and Richard O’Brien (endocrinology professor at the University of Melbourne and frequent expert witness) to explain why science and law struggle to communicate.

Australia , Cambridge , Cambridgeshire , United-kingdom , United-states , New-zealand , Canada , Sydney , New-south-wales , Australian , Scotland , Gary-edmond

Forensic science: The danger of relying on a single piece of evidence

Forensic science: The danger of relying on a single piece of evidence
14 Dec 2020
Searching for clues: A forensic expert looks for human remains in a pit in Serbia that is believed to contain the bodies of ethnic Albanians killed during the 1998-99 war. (Photo by Sasa Djordjevic/AFP)
At the core of the criminal justice system lies a big responsibility: suitably punishing perpetrators of crimes and exonerating the innocent. Although this sounds like a straightforward undertaking, misleading forensic evidence has proven to be one of the biggest systematic defects — one that has cost many innocent people their freedom.
Although relatively reliable in most instances, forensics can be subject to several errors, inconsistencies, and biases, which has resulted in the wrongful arrests of innocent people.

South-africa , Germany , United-states , South-african , Sabine-grein , Adebola-olaborede , Frank-molter , Naomi-elster , Gary-edmond , Armin-weigel , Lirieka-meintjes-van , African-police-service