Guidance Division News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

An injury that required treatment, they have not had illness that introduced prolonged disability, they have been healthy. Without a mandatory periodic examination, there is no reason for them to come in so they are going to most of their medical encounters will occur with their primary care physician. They will always turn to their primary care physician for guidance. If you have a member that, for example, has attorney something in his leg, he is more likely to go to his doctor and talk to his doctor about that and get that fixed through the doctor than to come to you for care, correct . Tha...

Being terminated within the department it is in that parameter if you and your office make a recommendation if the member can be medically approved to prove on. If the member cant be medically approved to move on, you make that determination . Correct. For work related injury always under the guidance of the division of Workers Compensation. If the division of Workers Compensation accepts the findings of the independent physician, we have the obligation to follow the guidance that is handed to us by the division of Workers Compensation. For nonwork related injury, it is a totally different pat...

The filing responsibility is on the commissioner who did the recuse recusal. Right. Im thinking would there be some accountability that this person has recused him or herself and they filed this form. So should the Actual Department of the commission be notified . They would be aware of the actual recusal because it occurred that it occurred prior to the filing requirement. The filing requirement is a requirement imposed by the Ethics Commission. So i dont know that that would be something that they would be looking to ensure that its because the responsibility is actually on the commissioner ...

Recusal. Right. Im thinking would there be some accountability that this person has recused him or herself and they filed this form. So should the Actual Department of the commission be notified . They would be aware of the actual recusal because it occurred that it occurred prior to the filing requirement. The filing requirement is a requirement imposed by the Ethics Commission. So i dont know that that would be something that they would be looking to ensure that its because the responsibility is actually on the commissioner who recused themselves. But there is again, in the public environmen...

Recusal. Right. Im thinking would there be some accountability that this person has recused him or herself and they filed this form. So should the Actual Department of the commission be notified . They would be aware of the actual recusal because it occurred that it occurred prior to the filing requirement. The filing requirement is a requirement imposed by the Ethics Commission. So i dont know that that would be something that they would be looking to ensure that its because the responsibility is actually on the commissioner who recused themselves. But there is again, in the public environmen...